My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/05/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/05/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:40:25 AM
Creation date
9/28/2006 8:01:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/05/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Amendment and rezoning request of the applicant that was. recommended for denial.. by. the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Brauer requested notice be taken of the density transitioning <br />as required in th~ Staff Review Letter. He indicated this density transitioning should be required <br />to meet City Code. <br /> <br />Motion on the. floor amended as follows: to recommend that the City Council approve the <br />preliminary plat and preliminary site plan for Ebony Woods, contingent upon the City Staff <br />Review Letter and the City Council granting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning <br />request of the applicant that was recommended for denial by the Planning Commission, and that <br />density transitioning be required to meet City Code as required in the City Staff Review Letter. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Hunt, Brauer, Cleveland, <br />Levine, and Trites Rolle. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner VanScoy. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt requested the record reflect a qualifier to. ensure there is no ambiguity. It <br />should be clear the recommendation for approval of the preliminary plat and site plan is strictly <br />for the purpose of providing the Council input from the Planning Commission on the subjective <br />assessment of the site, and should be taken in that context only. The Council should review the <br />prior denials as part of the Planning Commission's review of this plan in aggregate. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review of Minnesota Waterjet, Inc.; Case of Minnesota <br />Waterjet, Inc. <br /> <br />Management Intern Gladhill stated Minnesota WateIjet has applied for site plan review for the <br />development of a 20,528 square foot office/warehouse facility in the Sunfish Lake Business Park <br />Third Addition. Minnesota WateIjet manufactures custom design metal products. The subject <br />property is 1.87 acres in size and is zoned E-l Employment; the proposed building is a permitted <br />use in this district. <br /> <br />Management Intern Gladhill advised the site plan complies with the front yard, rear yard, and ... <br />side yard setbacks established in the E-l Employment District. Outlot A exists on the south <br />property line as a proposed future road expansion of 144th Ave. Lot coverage has been calculated <br />. at 25.2%, which is under the 40% maximum lot coverage restriction established in City Code. <br />The site will derive access from Azurite Street. The off-street parking and maneuvering areas <br />will be surfaced with bituminous paving and finished with concrete curbing. The site plan is <br />proposing sufficient parking stalls. Staff is recommending that the access be changed to future <br />1 44th Avenue, when that road is constructed. Mr. Gladhill indicated the proposed exposed <br />aggregate and random rib precast panel material on the exterior walls is permitted in the E-l <br />Employment District. The grading and drainage plan is generally acceptable with the revisions <br />outlined in the City Staff Review Letter. The landscaping plan is generally acceptable in <br />accordance with the revisions outlined in the City Staff Review Letter. Mr. Gladhill advised <br />staff recommends site plan approval contingent upon the compliance with City Staff Review <br />Letter dated September 1, 2006. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 7, 2006 <br />Page 1l.of20 <br /> <br />Pll <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.