My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/05/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/05/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:40:25 AM
Creation date
9/28/2006 8:01:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/05/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Chairperson Nixt asked what the total area is of the subject property. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Daines replied the parcel is 1.1 acres. <br /> <br />Chairperson Ni~t questioned if a rezoning to R-l would essentially allow three houses' on the <br />parcel. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes replied yes, but there could be an issue with lot frontage. R-l zoning <br />would likely allow three single family homes with one lot shorter in the back. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked what is left to be developed as commercial in this area other than this <br />site. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Frolik replied this is the last vacant parcel in this <br />area. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy stated he has spent extensive time on this lot; a tree survey has been done, and they <br />will try to be as un-invasive as possible with the trees. There is a natural buffer between the <br />Superbowl parking lot and the beginning of this parcel. This would not be an easy location to do <br />a commercial building, and in his estimation commercial would not be the best use of the <br />property. Mr. Murphy noted there was concern brought up before regarding traffic. He <br />explained with six units he believes the traffic will be much less of a concern than if there were <br />to be an office building on the lot, which would bring in a lot more traffic during the daytime <br />OO~. . <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the applicant has any questions regarding the City Staff Review Letter. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy responded in the negative. He indicated the revised plan shows the shakes artd <br />gables planned on the brick and the color scheme. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked what type of market analysis has been done regarding the proposed <br />development. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy replied he is a real estate agent in this area. The market in this area generally runs in <br />the $250,000 range on the upper end, and there are not any single level living type possibilities in <br />this immediate area, other than in the Alpine Drive/Highway 47 area, which are in the $260,000 <br />to $270,000 range. As far as the area with Ryland, Pulte and D.R. Horton, no one has supported <br />a plan with single level living. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if this development would be a common interest community. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy replied there would be separate ownership interests per property with an association. <br />The association would be managed by the homeowners and would take care of the common <br />areas. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/September 7, 2006 <br />Page 5 of 20 <br /> <br />P5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.