My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 02/10/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2025
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 02/10/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:24:02 AM
Creation date
2/7/2025 8:36:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
02/10/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Analysis of Waste Collection <br />Service Arrangements, <br />Minnesota Pollution Control <br />Agency, June 2009. <br />Analysis of Waste Collection <br />Service Arrangements, <br />Minnesota Pollution Control <br />Agency, June 2009. <br />The Benefits of Organized <br />Collection, Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency, <br />Feb. 2012. Analysis of Waste <br />Collection Service <br />Arrangements, Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency, <br />June 2009. <br />C. Open collection versus organized collection: <br />pros and cons <br />1. Open collection <br />There are several frequently cited advantages of open collection: <br />• Residents have more choice and are free to select a solid waste collector <br />based on their preference. <br />• There is a direct relationship between the solid waste collector and its <br />customers. <br />• There are minimal administrative costs for cities. <br />• Smaller solid waste collectors are better able to enter the market in an <br />open collection system by servicing a portion of city residents. <br />In contrast, there are several frequently cited disadvantages of open <br />collection: <br />• Open collection generally results in a more expensive monthly cost for <br />residents. <br />• Multiple collectors mean more truck traffic and the resulting negative <br />side effects, including the potential for added street maintenance costs, <br />and increased vehicle noise and emissions, fuel consumption, and <br />vehicle accidents. <br />• There may be inconsistent charges for the same level of service in a city. <br />• Cities have reduced ability to manage solid waste collection. <br />2. Organized collection <br />There are several frequently cited advantages of organized collection: <br />• The price paid by households in an organized collection system is <br />generally lower per month for similar service levels than in an open <br />collection system due to increased efficiencies from serving every <br />household or business in the community or on a particular route. <br />• Limiting the number of solid waste collectors allows cities to decrease <br />the impacts of increased truck traffic, including the potential for added <br />street maintenance costs, vehicle noise and emissions, fuel consumption, <br />and vehicle accidents. <br />• Cities have greater ability to manage solid waste collection and can <br />establish service requirements. <br />• Standardized service makes public education easier. <br />• Cities' ability to seek requests for proposals on a regular basis helps <br />lower costs. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 5/6/2024 <br />City Solid Waste Management Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.