My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/03/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/03/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:51:30 PM
Creation date
9/29/2006 3:05:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/03/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />John (Mac) LeFevre has recommended that the City obtain a quotation from their appraiser to complete an <br />updated of the original appraisals as they will be older than 6 months at the time they will be reviewed by <br />the Commissioners. I yviU request this proposal from Integra Real Estate Services and prepare a <br />recommendation for your review. I will also get a revised Appraisal for the parcel "I" (celftOwer parcel) <br />as the original did not include sub-leases with other phone service providers. <br /> <br />I have also notified Muir that the city intends to take over all responsibility for relocation of the existing <br />business within the project area and that any future Purchase Agreements they execute should not include <br />relocation costs or benefits. Mr. Dan Wilson is currently preparing a "relocation cost estimate" that will <br />be incorporated into our overall project budget. Mr. Wilson will also be convening a meeting for all <br />property owners to attend and learn of their rights for relocation benefits as part of this action by the City. <br /> <br />Mike Mulrooney continues to search for replacement parcels for the Stanton parcel. Given the cities <br />cooperative position in trying to secure Mr. Stanton a.sujtable parcel for his relocation, I feel the City <br />should immediately request Mr. Stanton sign an Access Agreement or stop.all efforts to find a suitable <br />replacement property and let the courts decide .on value and relocation. <br /> <br />, ... <br />. In a meeting this past week it was decided that the City should not proceed ahead with any early <br />acquisition without having Muir's Letter of Credit in place giving the city assurances that Muir will re- <br />purchase the parcels from them, <br /> <br />Access Agreements <br />Currently Muir has Access Agreements for six of the sixteen parcels. Without the remaining Access <br />Agreements, Muir will not be able to meet their submittal deadline of October 2006. Subsequently, I am <br />recommending that the City ask Mac LeFevre to petition the Courts for Right of Access for all sixteen <br />parcels as soon as possible. Concurrently, Bill Goodrich could continue to try and negotiate these rights <br />with an understanding that the court proceedings will take a minimum of two weeks. This will allow us to <br />notify Muir of a "date certain" that they will have rights to access the property and complete their <br />surveying, environmental and soils investigations. <br /> <br />(Note: The City has not completed Phase I Environmental reports on either the Stanton or Amble parcels. _ <br />Muir now has a Purchase Agreement and Access Agreement with Amble sothis work can be completed. <br />It was determined that the City should complete the Phase I Audit of the remaining parcels. Sean Sullivan <br />will direct NTI to complete this work as well as update their completed Phase One's that needed <br />additional site review as a result of snow cover during the original visit.) <br /> <br />Site Plan <br />Muir has requested some clarification from the City regarding their proposed "Fitness" tenant. In the <br />original RFP and Muir's subsequent response, the City indicated that they would preferthat Muir not <br />include a fitness user on their site as this may conflict with goals and objectives of the Ramsey Town <br />Center Community Center development. Given the current status of Ramsey Town Center, Muir is asking <br />if the City still stands by this position or would they now agree to a fitness user in Ramsey Crossings. <br /> <br />They have also begun to look at moving the home improvement tenant back to the southwest comer of the <br />site. I should have a concept site plan shortly to review with you and staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.