My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/27/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/27/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:29:24 AM
Creation date
2/20/2025 1:47:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/27/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner Peters, to close the public hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Bauer, Peters, Anderson, and <br />Hunt. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Heineman and VanScoy. <br />Chairperson Gengler closed the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Motion by Commissioner Hunt, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to adopt Resolution #24- <br />361 Approving a Variance to Side Yard Right -of -Way Setback in Garden View. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Hunt, Anderson, Bauer, and <br />Peters. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Heineman and VanScoy. <br />6.02: Public Hearing: Consider the Preliminary Plat for Emerald Estates, Located along <br />181st Avenue, West of Xenolith Street (Project No. 24-123); Case of Landform <br />Professional Services, LLC <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Gengler called the public hearing to order at 7:12 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Senior Planner Anderson presented the staff report stating that staff recommends approval of the <br />Preliminary Plat, contingent upon compliance with staff's review comments. <br />Commissioner Bauer commented that it would seem if they followed the recommendation of the <br />County to construct a road that would impact the buildable area of the lots. He commented that <br />separate driveways would seem to be more feasible. <br />Senior Planner Anderson confirmed that is accurate. He stated that if there were a service road, <br />lots 12 and 13 may very well be rendered not buildable. <br />Citizen Innut <br />Eric Luth, Landform, spoke in representation of the applicant. He stated that a memorandum was <br />included in the packet which responded to the comments of the County. <br />Chairperson Gengler asked if the applicant has looked at the suggestion for pairing driveways. <br />Mr. Luth stated that because these are custom-built, they would prefer to allow property owners to <br />choose the location of their driveway and noted that typically there is a spacing of 100 feet between <br />Planning Commission/ December 19, 2024 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.