Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Barten; Commissioners Bennett, Olson, Arts, Ealain, and <br />Leistico. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Sis. <br />5. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />5.01: Playground Replacement Planning — Central Park <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood presented background information on the <br />playground replacement program. He stated that at the November meeting the Commission <br />discussed potential improvements and provided direction to staff to further narrow the scope. He <br />stated that staff have since worked to develop a proposed plan for Central Park and presented <br />background information on the existing playground as well as the proposed concept for improving <br />the playground. He provided the proposed cost of $449,000 which would include contingency <br />funds and explained how that proposed cost would be split between the Lawful Gambling Fund <br />and Park Trust Fund. <br />Commissioner Bennett asked what would happen to the play equipment that is in good condition <br />and whether the diggers would remain at the park or be relocated to another park. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood stated that the playground equipment would <br />be removed and disposed of by the contractor, which would also include the removal of the <br />buckshot. He stated that the City would not reuse the play equipment. <br />Commissioner Leistico asked for details on the ongoing maintenance that would be required for <br />artificial turf. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood replied that there is a warranty on the <br />material, and it is his understanding that almost no maintenance is needed for years. He explained <br />the cleaning/fluffing that can be completed after a few years. <br />Chairperson Barten asked how the artificial turf compares to the poured -in -place surfacing. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood replied that the wear and tear is similar as is <br />the fall protection, but the cost of poured -in -place is a bit higher than artificial turf. He believed <br />that the turf would provide a cleaner look. <br />Commissioner Ealain stated that she likes that the artificial turf would provide more accessibility. <br />She also recognized that the music feature would be accessible but was not noticing any other <br />accessible features within the playground. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood replied that all of the new and modern <br />playgrounds are ADA accessible. He stated that the existing pea gravel not is considered <br />accessible. He stated that many of the components have transfer stations and provided more details <br />on the accessibility of different features proposed for the playground. <br />Chairperson Barten asked how much of the equipment is the equipment that was discussed in <br />November that had been sprayed the wrong color. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/ January 9, 2025 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />