Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Finance Officer Lund mentioned Mr. Hegg's costs had increased $500. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig expressed he does not think the City should pay any of it. He stated they <br />talked about sending people to China, but to get a bill after the fact is so jumbled. <br />Councilmember Elvig mentioned the Council stated there is a cap on the spending. He also <br />noted nothing was brought up about Mr. Hegg's fees nor were costs discussed and Council was <br />not made aware of Mr. Hegg's costs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated she does not agree with the proposal, but in the discussion of <br />last week, to the point of Mr. Hegg's services, the Council discussed costs that night. She stated <br />it is unreasonable for Mr. Hegg to assume he would be charging for his services. She stressed <br />she believes the City Council does bear some responsibility. She stated the Council had not <br />asked the questions or gotten to the details it should have. Councilmember Strommen said Mr. <br />Hegg should have laid out the costs and she is confused by how Mr. Hegg could bill Ramsey and <br />not Eden Prairie. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated the Lilli Pan expense is questionable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig mentioned he specifically asked Mr. Hegg how he gets paid on this. He <br />reported Mr. Hegg told him the Chinese set individuals up very well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen expressed questions about the hotel expenses. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked Attorney Goodrich if he could go through the expenses submitted and see <br />what agreement he could come to with Mr. Hegg. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey pointed out on the bill that the $8,832 is less the $4,500. He indicated <br />the overage on the China trip is $8,834 on a $4,500 cap. Councilmember Jeffrey recommended <br />paying Mr. Hegg only the agreed upon $4,500 cap. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked to review the expense fees and again questioned the Lilli Pan expenses. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig agreed with Councilmember Jeffrey to pay $4,500 and no more. He asked <br />if a proposal had been made to hire him. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson mentioned if one looks at the whole thing logically and what HSP & <br />Associates provided, it would be ludicrous to think the City would not be billed. She stated the <br />Council could not expect to get a bill and not pay for accrued costs. Councilmember Olson stated <br />the Council should look at what it got out of this and what it could potentially still get. She <br />mentioned a couple Chinese businessmen had been to Ramsey and talks with them are ongoing. <br />She asked if these are opportunities the Council wants to turn its back on and not pay HSP. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson stated he agrees somewhat with Councilmember Olson and believes <br />there was a misunderstanding over the total amount. He stated the Council should negotiate on <br />the amount so as not to destroy a good opportunity for the City. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / August 14,2006 <br />Page 2 of9 <br />