Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/27/2025

Home

City Planner Martin commented that the window sign examples shown in the presentation did not obtain proper permits, but the City also has not received complaints. Chairperson Gengler asked if painted windows are considered a window sign or temporary sign. City Planner Martin commented that would be considered window signage. Chairperson Gengler asked for clarification on the types of neon signs that would be allowed. City Planner Martin replied that he would get that answer for the next meeting. Chairperson Gengler confirmed the consensus of the Commission to eliminate the restrictions on window signage and replace with the general language suggested by Planning Manager Larson that the sign must be properly hung and in good condition. Councilmember Peters asked if a business receiving their business license is provided with a packet of regulations. City Planner Martin replied that there are some handouts for residents based on various types of projects. He agreed that once the sign code is completed and adopted, he could develop a similar package of information related to signage for a business. City Planner Martin continued his review relating to electronic message center (EMC) signs. Commissioner Van Scoy asked the rationale behind the restrictions. City Planner Martin replied that it is quite common to have standards in place, although those can vary widely between communities. Planning Manager Larson commented that it is also an issue of aesthetics as flashing or quickly changing messages can be seen as tacky. He recognized that people are not currently following the rules therefore the question is whether to enforce the rules or eliminate those rules. Commissioner Van Scoy commented that he recalled the rationale for the restrictions were related to driver safety as those messages can be distracting for drivers. Planning Manager Larson commented that he could speak with the Police Chief to determine if distraction from a sign was reported as the reason for an accident, but anticipated that response would be very low. Commissioner Anderson stated that he likes standardization and would prefer to match the seven - second standard that is used for the billboards. He agreed there should be instantaneous transitions between messages and did not believe animation should be allowed. Planning Manager Larson commented that scrolling text would fall under animation, noting an example of a current business sign that uses scrolling text. Planning Commission/ February 27, 2025 Page 5 of 9