Adopted 2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4. ,Dev~lop EducationakHf ;protdction educationel: community wide even$. educflte property ownelJ individual practices carifh . lr :1- ~~;:;:' 'We. .... ......~'. .... ~~:~~~~~~:~ :: 4J.lrage ..~~arti,~ipa.te .in regional programs that help i~'the corri~piol1!river quality issues and how their own . cIFup theriver}(i.e. Best Management Practices). -J ,,,. 40"oI Comprehensive Plan '~ 5. Purs'!e Grants and FUndtni s'~rcesVoi'Acqdl~itiOh.of sensitive lands: Some land area~ have been iden~jlt~ air :;signific~t ". eqyirOl)lll.ental features that should be protepted and managed;~p'i:~entop~nsP~.fheseareasare designated as Site I, Site 2 and the continuots~r4IiCorridor 011 t11cMNRRA opportunity map illustrated in Fiiure XI-6. . ~.~ j i $i~ n feature~ Sig~ifi~af~W~flands that Pf~vid~~a.turalhabitat. This area is adJaqent to reSIdentIal ~f'lrtl~;.on the ~()P.thtmd agnculture property on the north, kh~~s:~:~k~;o~~~c;~i~ ;pr ~e;~~~;;~~~:l:i~~~~tu~~u~~ss~~~ :~:~~ its tr~sfer of developm~nt .~M'he~q~IWitylijs transferred tothemore developable prop~rty to the north '~.~e .. .;' pur~~e~off.~eV{llol'f1ent .rights, or conservation easeI1l.ent purchase. Ac~~s{tio~~y the pu~)ic~houl9.be a last priority for protection of Site 1. :r' .:' ..,' ;;.,- Site ~. features some la.np~~t(M:e prQteqted by the flo()pplain ordinance, some lands prote~ted through wet1apct'.tegftl~tions apdso~e lappsthat are not protected at all. Site ~ is a more sign~~. It~.~ce of l~~ bl;'cause'of its river frontage. Public Acquisition would appf.lat.fot~e. the prioptyfor.protection .of this site because ~ood~lain ordinancesnp~sJilllWprmitc~~ ~~yelol'mentactivity. A study should be completed to establi~hil~~ed aeq1Jis~tio~iboundary of significant lands and a mana,ement plan shouldlb.p:~~ inpl~~'tha~focuses on . low cost passive uses I)ossitiHy restoring lands~t~a~elbeen d~~bep. back to native vegetation or a small s,cenic. overlook site. ~ai<iuuil~ark SeMgeEpnds could he used in tandem with funding from the City, J)~ ~opoli~ ~ouJlcil,llon"profitgroups or other entity intere$ted in riverfront prot~tiof' ..... .... . \' j- c.. ontin... uos Trail Corridorttpje C .1; ... . be part of the MNRRA~cplj:i -~ - ; - - ',: ,'. - .i;;' uniqu~ to Ramsey. Ma1jyrcq qther )instances, the CitY. · , expe$nces. A general.. datin~back to 1989: hoW should not necessarily'J:> ~rtidpatory process tog, shoulp be public or pri~a align~ent should be uSe4. desirea element by the 8ll' meet the needs of the conb ~s ageJ;jerallocatioll,for a trllilcorridor that would 's tri~ '~fridor. Strong public opposition is not iti~ tic~si~ilar 81'1lQsitio~.. Like it has done in y Sho~l~..s~ek..to.le~ tropt other community's it of:a~iai c~~idorC~l be {ound in an ordinance y resJ~eJlts~ereinotawartl'of this. This corridor one~ b'utrsh~~ldj)e reevall1ated using a public . ho~ l~cffl ~~..resefVed. forithe site, whether they the)', s~o~ld~e u~ep,'~in~inedand what exact d al~o~e\cle~to fesidents that a trail corridor is a '.' uni..ty.. ....\.~'...... $I.... tiU......it ...:.....theeityis ensuring involvement to ppertyc)~erS'.' . -L } i ji' P ,:; The qreenway Corridor~r,!esft~s .anaJ;ea~tma.y~ntain: a significant natural r~sour~e or may be a.n111f>~ . i" l111k; tqc011l1~9t .slgOlficantareas. Much of the riverfront area is contain~ln; i,eenw~}'~ort1'or'Jheintentof this designation is to provide an area that#;~raefJ9t1~o~roteft. environmental resources and fte~:n~~~r;~:::~t;t>> i s~d~dit~fc:ob:p~:::e~~~a~: ~~~dsi~~ . .' 101\ . . ~. iY .. -2 - ,.~ 2001 Ramsey Comprelfensive Plan t J Page Xl-21 ~- -n~~"