Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I ~ 1~ <br />f rl. <br />i <br />-g 1" <br />f1 , jtL~ <br />I i l; <br />t I l:~ <br />! ~ r; <br />4. Staging Ofp,vel()pment ' <br /> <br /> <br />200IC;omprehensive Plan <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br /> <br />~"-'~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />Within the 2000 MU$ <br />land zoned residential <br />thiS is within shorelafl <br />a~ady platted singl~ <br /> <br />,. , 'C';~',. <br /> <br />Th;e future land use.Plg~qpnterts sQm~lt\nd~tbl~ithr MUSA previously guided <br />for commercial/indu~ .~ cj~eloPJ3l~t~to .i~sid,~ntial.It also increases the <br />detisity of develoPtn'n.....tit1i~ .ur~al1,;~~as:r~dencpurage.~imore multi-family <br />ho~sing to accoIll1l1o..Pif*j~ycle~h~w.g~daffordable'housing goals. The <br />fu~e land use plan co "!i4~2 aCfe.~o~de~~lopable residential land (inc1u,ding <br />vafant platted lots)w' ..;tlle cup.-~tj20~~i MUSA, 60 ,acres . of which are <br />de~ignated for mediwp 'p~tIh:,denslty~~sit!.:g. Given the densities proposed in <br />th4 future land usepl+,~rQ'~y 2,2fl?'~~s c()uldbe accommodated on this <br />la1\d.ll However, tYPieal~v~lqpment~atte~'\ViU likely not attain this level due <br />to the desire to proviqe ~~i,tion betWeen~~stingresidential development and <br />futW"e urban develoP1tl~t~ : if'..: .... .... · ...... <br /> <br /> <br />~ ~n:;~r l:~~=::" needS; an analysis of the <br /> <br />existing land'uJelsly is nec~ssary;Taple V-lprovjdes a general <br />overview of"efi(tinJ}and useiand"Appenc:lix B'provides a greater <br />breakdown of tfci,~;!landus.e .ver.~etropolitan Cpuncil requirements. <br />The Metropo~tfnfC~Cil projeqts,tliat..;Ralllsey will'. add approximately <br />5,200 househol'si bf,eenth!~e~:;;19~5and2020 or just over 200 <br />householdsp,rt.-.JiUhe ft11Ufe!an~,}ls~tplan confllles urban residential <br />growth to witblttp.e~SAex:pap,siq:,~e~along Highway 10. <br /> <br />The followin~ +spttl)tions have~~~:ltlade in order to provide estimates <br />of future land ~~qt;H bas~d~n..~theFMetrQPolitan Coun.cil's projections <br />and land avaifatJ.{ty. lvtthin theClty Q'fRamsey: <br />~ t .' H:- ,': . ...;: -;::~. <br />~. . ,. . . . - - . <br /> <br />9 This figure is llasedlon the number ofurg <br />a minimum den$ity of2.5 units per acrefdr <br />units per acre for the ppper limit of conswP. <br />County GIS basbmaprdata to detennineaVe <br />10 This figure dcWendj on the density ofdqV <br />marketable for the pr~duct proposed to belp <br />units per gross Iicre f~r single family in thO <br />land. However,jthe zbning code requires, <br />in R-l U district$, wh!:h poses a barrier oob <br />residential housing islconsistently develop~ <br />roughly to 3 units pe~gross acre. '1 <br />II Total units w~ebafed on densities of 1~ <br />medium density, 4 ~ts per net acre forlQ}v <br /> <br />rnliij issu~~~s' year fr01111992 to 1997 divided by <br />o . .~ limit o$q()ns tioW~d a mIDfimum density of 3 <br />. ': e derlsities~e teiwi~ed by using the Anoka <br />per .c~f<ifv us(iev~lopmen..ts. <br />that thejileirel . deciMs would be the most <br />currqnt~()~g de calls out a maximum density of 4 <br />..... . ct, wbt;cp,fco .,' .'~equlk of vacant residential <br />: lot sjze'~fcJO,~mQ sqJ,l~efeetfot single-family units <br />~ actual,;q~i1~of4U11i~ per a9re. Existing <br />'es of3~to3.5 mutspet-liet acre. which equates <br /> <br />t aere[ot;urb~high density, 7 units per acre for <br />side,nti1.~ . ~. .. .. . <br /> <br />2001 Ramsey ComArehensive Plan <br /> <br />i; .~~ <br /> <br /> <br />Page V-29 <br /> <br />~ ; <br /> <br />~!<:' <br />_"". ~-1"~~ <br />