Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~_....r~~'j~, <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: foA.ayor Reimann, Cotmcilnenbers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />CF~e *9: Site !mprovements For R~ River Terrace ImProvement Project <br />#88-13: <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated .t;.hat .DNR and Mn!DOT have rev iewed the plans for Rum <br />River 'n:rrace. <br /> <br />Councilnenber- DeLuca suggested that the City begingto reguire continuity <br />in project lighting, noting that high pressure sodium is the most <br />aesthetic. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilnanber Cox and seconOed by Councilnenber Pearson to adopt <br />. ResolutiontSB-71 approving plans and specifications and order <br />advertisement for bids for Improvement Project *88-13. (Please refer to <br />resolution file for Resolution *.88-71) . <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: ft'..ayor Reimann, Cotmc:.lnanbers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Ms. Norris requested clarification Of'...Council's previous decision regarding <br />MI. Carlson's r€Ouest for $124,000 in site improvements and $50,000+ in <br />land write-dOwns: <br /> <br />~~yor Reimann replied that in accordance with the tax increment policy <br />established earlier this evening, the City will not be participating in f.'Ir. <br />Carlson's reguest for land write-downs. <br /> <br />Case ~10: Purchase Of sPecial Assessment Software: <br /> <br />Finance Officer Graczyk was present requesting Council approval to purchase <br />special assessment software for the computer in oroer to automate the <br />City's current manual special assessment system. Mr. Graczyk reviewed the <br />costs with Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Gocx:irich recommended Council approval of the' request. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to <br />apprO\Te t.'1e purchase of the special assessment system software. <br /> <br />l'iOtion carried. Voting Yes: l'..ayor Reimarm, Councilnembers Sorteherg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting. No: None. <br /> <br />Case *11: <br /> <br />Services To Be Considered For Contr?ctino Out: <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka notec that the bids for street crack filling were estimated to <br />come in at about $15,000; 13 bids were received; low bid was Bergman <br />Companies at $8,300. ttr. Raatikka recommenoec that since the bias \\7ere <br />cor.siClerably less than estimateo, t.'1e City take this opportunity to include <br />crack filling on certain !.1SA roads also. <br /> <br />City Council/April 26, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />