Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />(", C::P fil c: Sc~h~d\f'ef.~;>pc iL1Meei"'i'''.:"cfl:;,!" c Il~ sMPf f Bburc. 2. n.'Re,'iE~{'ns <br />J.i.I.i!:"I,c."'~'~ " ~:',l,'tY"'lr:"-"~ :',0_" PzI.-' c:' ('iT"' -.:. ~" 'I)p'~f 'opri''--r~: 'Al'.t " 0-, -; ~ _,. : <br /> <br />';,;j\;:'.",i>\ .; !'.';, <br /> <br />~;oti"nl:>y CO\ihcilmer::cr SorteDen, STiC ~ccc!lGec by ColincilUi€J:.ou feener; tc <br />schedul€<J~pecial joint IDE:€tiTlg ~dth thE' Planning and Zoning Coum.i.sdon, <br />Ec onore ic De,'e 1 opmer. t C ommis 6 ion a r.c Ee on omic Deve 1 opment C ompa ny for <br />honday, December 5. 1988 at 7:30 p.Il.. to.discuss l1USA boundary revisions <br />c:.ndestablishment of an Economic Development Authority. <br /> <br />~!oti(\n q:rciu:. <br />DeLLCi:. Pu:r-~Gn <br /> <br />\' oUn 1; YES: <br />ond Ic]\.;cen. <br /> <br />r.~yer Leit:.an!" <br />\'Qfing I:e: Fe-r,c. <br /> <br />Counei lnlt:'mheTf <br /> <br />SOT te beT b , <br /> <br />Casp ~iJO: F\pviev Sl'ettP P12nFo.... CedE~ Pills :rropospe S('bdi\"if~or V;'h <br />Rp!'Dect To Roae &.cesF' C2<:f'. Of Kr. .\o;l,r:lh' Anee-rc::on <br />( Con t im)."- d \ : <br /> <br />fir. Hartley stated that after researching. he bas found that any proposed <br />subdivision consisting of mo.rethan 100 units is requiredtP prepar(: an <br />environment~lassessIIlent ",'orksheet. Or. that basis, Cedar Hills would he <br />required to prepare an EA\\. Mr. Bart ley r ec ommendecJtha tCityC ounci! <br />order an EA}.' for all three proposed subdivisions in that immediate area; <br />Cedar Hills, \\'indemere \.;oods and Chestnut Hills. Mr. Hartle)' recoUl!!!enoed <br />that the -E.A\'; be ordered when Council receives the sketch plan for Chestnut <br />Hills. <br /> <br />NAYOR ARD COUNCIL INPUT <br /> <br />c) Discussion regarding park dedication for BY-I04th Addition; case of <br />RJt F~udio and ~orm Holm - <br /> <br />Hr. Goodrich st,ted that z..:r. Raudio H conceHd3d '\I.,ith the applicatic-n of <br />the appropr:..ate park deCication orcinance to BY-IO 4th Addition and the <br />,'alue placed on the property fer the se;.-ected ordinance to apply to. In <br />this instance. the park decicat.icnorc.:"I:ance adopted in July, 1988, is <br />being applied to EY-I0 4th; it indicates that park dedication will be lO~~ <br />of land value; in By-l0 4th thot amounts to $9740. Mr. Raudio feels park <br />cedication should be commensurate '\I.'ith BY-I0 3rd Addition as BY-IO 4th is <br />further subdivision of one of the lots in BY-IO 3rd. <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio explained the history of RY-IO and that the reasonforphtting <br />witb outlots ",'as to be able to custcr.r.ize lot sizes for future customerS. to <br />imply future subdi,-ision and avoidinc1.:rring increased tax.es that <come ,,'ith <br />platted~ots in a~certain period of time. In platting HY-IO 3rd.tbe <br />developer agoin desired to p1.st ,,-ith an \outlot but the City insisted on <br />rull platting. If HY-lO 3rd had been appprovec with an outlot, the future <br />subdivision efthat outlet '\I.'ould have been subject to the park dedicotion <br />ordinance in effect during BY-IO 3rd platting (collected in building <br />permits) . <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that whether the subject property "'as platted as an <br />cutlot or a lot, resubdh-ision of it constitutes a ne~" subcivision subject <br />to current pork dedication requirements and assessed value, '\I.'hether it is <br />outlot or lot, is calculated in the same '\I.'ay. <br />Cit)' Council/l'ovember 16, 1988 <br /> <br />Fag.e.7 of 10 <br /> <br />I~O <br />