|
<br />;j.'-'~'
<br />
<br />
<br />.._-::~_.~~,W...;o,-
<br />
<br />_~ ~~'.,..'s.....' ...~ ,:
<br />
<br />..;~'- :.--i. ',' ~~:~;....-...
<br />
<br />..-r"
<br />
<br />....-,,. . ...-=:
<br />
<br />':pc 11,_ "'..
<br />
<br />hasbroug'ht some re1i€'f to the steffinglE',\,t'l problem in Finence. 'I'hE'
<br />dep&rr.m€r.: iEin tht rr('ce~Ec-f cC'Ily(rt:ing to tn( nC\.' COtr:~t:t(r >yrtcrr aLe:
<br />C6Ul.1I:'ilEhct::c: SC(c ~rt(': ~:~.~'rc\:,trJtr.:'f iT tL{;t:"Utl1l"rt"'t E ('-: :ir,c:.1;c i c~
<br />I-f:li(l:-t iL~..
<br />
<br />~) Discussion regarding John Gobernatz nnnor subdi"isiC'll -
<br />
<br />Hr. John Gobernatz st.ltedhe initiated a mir;or subcli"ision in June to give
<br />his son a lot; at that tiu..e. he \<"(;S iLlerrued that park decicaticn ,,'ct:ldn't
<br />l>e mud:; \-her-he got final approval, he \-'u. ir.:ormcd theit paTl;dedicCit.:in:
<br />v6ulc'bE: 1 cr 03 tln.: 'lLnd Ci1- lLT;a(}\'21~f> C:l1C-rl"JLt L:E: \:ill [}ETE.;C~-t:ir f:G .t c, l;~':
<br />C'rbiv(. i:I!ntJ;i::- J(-;: (.[,;tJlti.tuC1H: s~l,(jy:ic{S {.:,c-tlH.:r let; if f,-E. r.iYf ~'-f"~cL
<br />d hiE children a lot, tlll'city "';..11 (\'1'. IIer€: of his rr('~'e:rty tl1<..L h
<br />ci oe s.
<br />
<br />Mr. Hartley stated that R<lmsey's orcinance indicatefl that each tillle a
<br />propertyresubdhides, ltwill be subject tcpark dedication. For that
<br />reason. it makes more sense to plat the entire piece of property at one
<br />time.
<br />
<br />Nr. Gobernatz notedthat if he plats the entire parcel, the tc:>~es ",ill
<br />shan 1)- ip.cTease ir. 3 yeaTs~ whether the lotE haVE developed or net; h~
<br />won' tbe able to afford to keep b is land.
<br />
<br />Mr. Ban\<.'art noted that assessors State ",ice disagree v.,ithState le",-' and
<br />\o~oulGprefer that ta~ values only go up ar.property develops. If the h,,-'
<br />were amended, Ramsey could use it's park ciecHcaticn requirement in a
<br />favorab Ie light .
<br />
<br />CouncilmenberSorteberg noted thet the ne..' park dedication orCl.r.ance w~s
<br />explaiLeci to Council as one that a110,,'s for taking acombitaticn c: laLe
<br />and/or cash; the potential for a p,::rcel to pay park dedicbt:.onmany times
<br />was not pointed out.
<br />
<br />Mr. .oan"'a:,t created a scenario of a large de,'eloper purchas ing a parcel;
<br />doing a mir,or subdivision to create one or t",'olots ana paying the park
<br />fee; the aevelopE'r could then plat the property to it's ult:.n;ate der;sity
<br />and not berequirec to pa)'any ~c1clitional park fees,,~hile sharply
<br />increasing the population in the, City.
<br />
<br />Mr.B~n\;'artncted thatv.'ithout sutjecting resubdivision to park fee
<br />requirements,a developer could eo a ttir.or subdivison, pay tl:e parI: fee,
<br />r~subdiviae the property to it's ul~imate density and thereby sharply
<br />increaset'he City~s population on the one small contribution to parks.
<br />
<br />Mr. Raatikka n.oted that 177th fronts on ~r. Gobernatz' property; the
<br />alignt!ient of it. as it has b~enmaintained for at least 15 years, is
<br />partially on l>tr. Gobernatz'prcperty.
<br />
<br />Mr. Goodric:h stated that unless the City wants to initiate an iIllpro'\'ement
<br />project, which woulci include re,ligning the road into it's correct
<br />position,the City 'has the righttc lea'\'e the road 'W.here it is. Mr.
<br />City Council/Rovember2~, 1988
<br />
<br />Page 10 of 11
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />..
<br />
<br />,_c.-:.,:
<br />
|