Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />,-.. <br />..~) <br />1 <br /> <br />. "", <br />:1- <br />...... . .,,~. <br />J <br /> <br />-: <br /> <br />. <br />/.".J <br />~! <br />-'.. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Consensus was that Mr. James Y~rtin should be invited <br />to this meeting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Ye.s: Chairmans Greenberg and Zimmerman, <br />Commissioners Holm, Kurak, Muller, Hendriksen and Fults. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto then presented overheads ,,'hich indicated that both sides of Hwy. <br />no are proposed to be developed with frontage roads. Discussion ensued <br />regarding proposed and alternate alignments for a frontage road on the <br />north side of Hwy. ilIO and the need to establish alignments and preserve <br />right-of-way accordingly. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hendriksen referred to the P&Z Commission's recommendation to <br />deny Roger Hurd's request for a conditional use permit on the basis of lack <br />of information; that information was then submitted to Council for their <br />review and the request was approved. Consensus was to meet with City <br />Council early in 1989 to discuss concerns with Council not taking Planning <br />and Zoning Commission efforts into consideration when addressing a case. <br /> <br />Case (:2: Piscussion Ret8rdinr Monument Sirnin~ In Ramsey: <br /> <br />Mr. Otto reported that Mn/DO! is not favorable to the idea of Ramsey <br />placing monument signs in the Highway tIlO right-of-way; they suggest that <br />monument signing be placed on private property. Any signage would require <br />submitting plans and formal application to Mn/DOT. <br /> <br />Case (:3: Discus~ion Refard;nf Deve'onabi'itv Of Lot~ Alon~ Front <br />9treet: <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman noted that there is a development problem south of Hwy. <br />illO along Front Street as this area consists of auditor's subdivisions and <br />was never formally pl.anned and platted. The extension of Front Street has <br />split some of the existing lots and created the need to consider allowing <br />smaller lots sizes than normal in this area. To properly study this area, <br />an inventory of the area, including existing structures and vacant property <br />in relation to Front Street, is needed. <br /> <br />..;;,..;... <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Holm and seconded by Commissioner Fults to recommene <br />that City Council approve of Hakanson Anderson Associates preparing a study <br />of the Front Street area and developing a zoning plan accordingly. <br />Further, to recommend that part c: that study include a meeting with the <br />affected property owners. <br /> <br />l-!otion carried. Voting Yes: Chairmans Zimmerman and Greenberg, <br />Commissioners Holm, Kurak, Muller, Hendriksen and Fults. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />INPUT <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that developers are requesting to go with 60 rather <br />than 66 foot street widths in the urban area; 60 foot widths were allowed <br />in River's Bend and Flintwood 2, 3 and 4. <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning - Economic Development Commission/9-29-88 <br /> <br />:Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />(" <br />