Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />proposedf indings of fact. <br /> <br />C6uncilconsensus ":Bsthat Item <,'37 should .be amended to indicate that two <br />test plots have been installed to test the final cover f'ystem. <br /> <br />Council consensus "'as that Itei:l ~f67 'should clarify that the projected <br />in royalties is based on the proposed volume of the proposed <br /> <br />Relating to Item 4!72, CO\1ncil,,'as of the consensus tpatconsideringthe <br />request as awnole, it 'Will not adversely impair market value of <br />surrounding pr operty. <br /> <br />Council consensus was to delete Item 4173 stating the use is not harmonious <br />,,'ith the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Consensus was that Item 4'74 should be amended to indicate that the proposed <br />use will not change the essential character of the area. <br /> <br />Consensus 'Was to delete the ten: 'hazardous'" from Item 4f75 to iridicatethat <br />tbeproposed use ,,",ill only be disturbing to existing and future neighboring <br />uses. <br /> <br />Consensus 'Was that Item #77 should be amended to indicatetbattheusea.s a <br />~..bole may create 'additional requirements', not "'excessiveadditio'Ilal <br />requirements'" . <br /> <br />Consensus 'Was that Item ff78 should be broken into 4 parts to individually <br />address the vertical expansion, road'Way, ski hill and excavation/ transport <br />of materials. <br /> <br /> <br />Consensus was to delete Itel!:. (:79 regarding tbeElk River Landfill being a <br />viab Ie alternative. <br /> <br />Council directed that the teTE "'response action'" in Item #46 be changed to <br />"'remedial action.... <br /> <br /> <br />City Council/October 26, 1988 <br />