My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/10/88
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1988
>
02/10/88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2025 11:37:06 AM
Creation date
10/23/2006 10:53:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
02/10/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mayor Reimann expressed concern witb the size of School District No. 11 and <br />how children bussed in from other communities lose that feeling of identity <br />between school and community. <br /> <br />Mr. Finch stated that District No. 11 is 175 square miles in size and <br />includes 13 cities with approximately 32,000 students. There are some <br />concerns but the size of the District has enabled offering the students <br />some wonderful opportunities in terms of scope and quality of programs. <br /> <br />Mr. Finch did note that transportation, not distance, is a major concern <br />and that there is a great need for bridge crossings. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson inquired as to the trend for student enrollment. <br /> <br />Mr. Giraux replied that for the fi~st time since 1976, the District is <br />experiencing growth. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann inquired if there could be another elementary facility in <br />Ramsey. <br /> <br />Mr. Finch replied that at tbe present time, tbe growth rate in Ramsey would <br />not support another elementary scbool. <br /> <br />Mr. Gir~ux explained that a city experiencing a steady growth of 200-300 <br />homes per year is simply considered absorption and not to the point of <br />requiring another facility. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann stated that he is concerned witb tbe School District calling <br />for special elections when more of tbe voting public would bave had input <br />if the question were included on a regular election ballot. Mayor Reimann <br />stated that bond issues should include information regarding how much tbe <br />issue will cost commercial property as well as average residential <br />properties. People should be made aware that tbe commercial entity will <br />have to increase tbe cost of their products to pay tbeir share of tbe bond <br />issue. Tberefore, the resident pays twice -- once in property tax <br />increases and a second time in the increased cost of products. <br /> <br />Mr. Finch replied tbat the public school system exists at tbe will of <br />Legislature. In tbe past legislative sessions, tbere was a decline in <br />State revenue directed to public schools and tbe districts were told to go <br />to tbe voters for needed funds. District II's only alternative to making <br />major program cuts waS to hold a special levy referendum. Previous to this <br />tbe District made a major reciucticn of $7,000,000 and virtually everything <br />was cut back; if tbe most recent levy had not passed, a similar reduction <br />would have been necessary. Tbe District could not wait until the regular <br />election in November as law requires certifying tbe budget by October. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahle stated that publicizing more detailed information regarding levy <br />impacts on commercial properties presents problems as tbere are many <br />classifications for commercial property and various metbods of assessing. <br />Therefore, a decision was made to publicize the impact on homestead <br />properties and a percentage increase on all other types of properties. <br /> <br />City Council/January 19, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.