Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: <br />Fults and Ippel. Voting No: <br />Gorecki, Hardin and Wagner. <br /> <br />Chairman Greenberg, Commissioners Muller, <br />None. Absent: Corranissioners Vevea, Kurak, <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Case #2: Discussion Regarding Highway no Corridor study: <br /> <br />Corrunissioner Ippel noted that this case is on the agenda as a result of <br />comments made at the March 9, 1988 EDC meeting by Conunissioner Hardin and <br />stated that the case should be tabled until such time as Commissioner <br />Hardin is present to participate in the discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. James Martin was present and sutmitted his written comments regarding <br />the Hwy. #10 Corridor Study as it relates to his 101 acres in the southwest <br />quadrant of Hwy. #10 and Traprock Street (see Attachment I to these <br />minutes). A brief discussion ensued regarding Mr. Martin's concerns. <br /> <br />Conunissioner Ippel stated that discussion of the Hwy. no Study should be a <br />high priority item on the April 13 EDC agenda. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued again with Mr. James ~..artin regarding the need for long <br />range transportation planning. <br /> <br />Af;JrxffiNMENr <br /> <br />It was the consensus of those present to adjourn at 9:10 a.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully sutmitted, <br /> <br />Sylvia Frolik <br />Secretary <br /> <br />~.~~.- <br /> <br />Anne Norns - '-V <br />cOmmunity Developnent Director <br /> <br />Econanic Devel opnent Carunissi on/t-'larch 30, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br />27 <br />