Laserfiche WebLink
<br />') <br /> <br />If a person chooses to move their home to a new location, they are paid an <br />amount agreed to be representative of a replacement dwelling in their case. <br />All of that money must be expended moving the home before they are eligible <br />for additional funds from the housing replacement grant. <br /> <br />Mr. Bagley stated that Relocation Services tries to gain back for the city <br />as many of the dollars as possible that were expended in acquiring the <br />property by selling the buildings remaining on the site. <br /> <br />Tom Donohue noted that when an offer is made on a property, the property <br />owner has a reasonable amount of time to determine the offer is reasonable <br />and enter into a purchase agreement. The people will not be requested to <br />move for at least 90 days and 90 day notice cannot be sent out unless the <br />people are offered a comparable relocation site. To bring the title up to <br />marketable condition is the responsibility of the homeowner and is not a <br />reimbursable cost. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto inquired as to comments being received by Mr. Bagley and Mr. <br />Donohue in their contacts with the residents. <br /> <br />. <br />>". <br /> <br />Mr. Bagley stated that most of tbe people he talked to in Zone A are not <br />opposed to the project but they would like to know one way or another what <br />is going to happen. They are also concerned with recent talk of a <br />referendum election because they are directly affected by airport activity <br />and in favor of airport redevelopment but they would be outnumbered by <br />those persons not directly affected by airport improvements and voting no <br />because they aren't fully aware of what those improvements mean. Persons <br />in Zone A have said that they are concerned that the city is not <br />effectively making 'people aware of the actual improvement project activity <br />and people are deciding they are opposed to the project based on <br />rumors. <br /> <br />Mr. Norm Schiferl was present and requested being provided a copy of the <br />land use compatibility portion of the environmental assessment report prior <br />to the next public informational meeting. <br /> <br />CITIZEN INPUT <br /> <br />Barb Graen - 7321 150th Lane - Requested further explanation of the noise <br />impact portion of the assessment report. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto stated that Gateway North doesn't fall into the category of <br />airports required to do a computerized noise study. The method used takes <br />into account the type of airport, time of day most operations occur, flight <br />patterns and runway utilization characteristics. Using that information, a <br />noise foot print is obtained from a table; that footprint is overlaid onto <br />a map of the project site. Noise level standards acceptable to FAA, <br />Mn/DoT, Metro Council and HUD essentially state that 0-55 Idn is acceptable <br />for all residential areas; with 55-60 ldn there may be some specific <br />concer~s and land use controls implemented; with 60-65 Ian there will be <br />even more land use controls; and above 65 ldn there is signficant noise <br />impact. With the size of Gateway, the type and number of operations, there <br />would be a foot print of 65 ldn noise levels closely associated with the <br />runway with a bulb on either end and some sideline noise. <br />Airport Commission/November 12, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />