My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/25/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2025
>
Agenda - Council - 03/25/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 1:25:13 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 2:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/25/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For example, the City of Ramsey, which has actively sought and built hundreds of multifamily <br />units, and has always been keenly aware of the need for affordable housing, engaged in careful <br />planning and marketing for a rapidly developing COR area (Center of Ramsey downtown) for the <br />soon -to -be upgraded Highway 10 in the City. An increase in the development of commercial <br />properties in this area will greatly broaden the tax base in this city now as it has elsewhere. Many <br />of these properties have been provided with available sewer and water. <br />If some of the provisions we have seen circulating in the legislature were to come to pass, the City <br />would be unable to prevent a multi -family developer to build on any or all of those sites. Not only <br />would there no longer be a requirement for careful traffic studies to anticipate traffic and safety <br />issues, but the resulting development would increase traffic levels as well as service calls for things <br />like police and fire without creating sufficient tax revenue to offset those increase costs and <br />infrastructure expansions. Worse, in some parts of the city where those services are not yet <br />available, they could require the city to provide them without paying those costs. <br />This legislation would appear to be a case study of special interests and uninformed reformers <br />seeking to impose a harmful outcome for most citizens in the cities we represent. Serving as <br />stewards of our respective communities, we firmly believe in transparency throughout every aspect <br />of the public process and that it is important to ensure that every resident has a meaningful <br />opportunity to contribute to decisions made by their government. Limiting public hearings not only <br />restricts the voices of constituents but removes the ability of public comment to affect positive <br />change to development proposals that benefit both the proposed development and the existing <br />community surrounding new development. <br />Our concerns about legislative bills HF 1987/SF 2229, HF 2140/SF 2231, HF 2018/SF 2286, HF <br />2013 and SF 1268 stem from our commitment to safety, environmental preservation, and stable <br />communities for current and future generations. We strongly believe further pursuit of this <br />legislation, or any modification thereof is detrimental to building resilient, safe, and thriving <br />communities. <br />We would very much like to invite the members of the legislation prior to considering these <br />measures to visit our communities and see how well citizens with effective and active zoning and <br />planning histories and practices operate to the benefit of all Minnesotan. <br />On behalf of the City Council and Ramsey Residents, <br />Heineman, <br />Mayor <br />Cc: Sen. Calvin K. Bahr, Rep. Harry Niska <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.