My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/25/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2025
>
Agenda - Council - 03/25/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 1:25:13 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 2:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/25/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
have a different standing in the same neighborhood whether they own or rent in the neighborhood. <br />He stated this policy advocates for both renters and landlords. <br />Mayor Heineman shared that they removed this section because there was a lot of bias in the <br />section on retaliation. He noted that this can be subjective. <br />Councilmember Buscher noted that this discussion came as a result of tenant discomfort and she <br />thinks it is fair to keep the retaliation section in the policy. <br />Councilmember Specht stated that this policy was presented as a way to help both the landlord and <br />the tenant. <br />Planning Manager Larson explained that the basis for coming up with the policy was due to <br />concerns with how the City's ordinance was written and how the inspections were being <br />conducted. <br />Councilmember Riley added that this policy was also created from the City's perspective and that <br />it is in the best interest of the City that all rental properties are well maintained by both the landlord <br />and the tenant. He said he likes the draft put together by Staff as the policy is still doing what it <br />needs to do without being more restrictive than it needs to be. <br />Councilmember Specht said he is still not comfortable with requiring background checks for <br />property owners as only property managers are required to have a background check per State <br />statute. <br />Planning Manager Larson explained that most property owners are also technically the manager <br />which grants them the same access as a property manager. He stated this is included in the policy <br />as it gives all renters equal protection from whoever would be able to access the home or unit. He <br />added that this policy is modeled after Coon Rapids, and they also require background checks. He <br />noted there has only been one background check conducted so far that someone did not pass. <br />Councilmember Specht stated he thinks a background check on a property owner is an undue <br />burden. <br />Mayor Heineman agreed and noted that if someone hires a property manager to manage the rental <br />property then they would be required to have a background check. <br />Councilmember Stewart added that this would put undue liability on the City. <br />Councilmember Buscher asked if the City does not conduct a background check how they would <br />know if the property owner had a background check conducted on their property manager. <br />Councilmember Specht noted that if it is a requirement then he is fine with the City being the one <br />to run the background check since it falls under State law. <br />Councilmember Olson agreed. <br />City Council Work Session / March 11, 2025 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.