Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/27/2025

Home

Section 117-561) to subdivide the City's Property via a meets -and -bounds description in the following manner as depicted on Certificate of Survey dated 1-9-2025 and labeled Exhibit A: Parcel One - That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 34, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way. Also being a part of Lot 6, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 30, according to the recorded plat thereof. Abstract Property Parcel Two - Lots 6 and 7, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 30, except that part platted as DEAL INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the recorded plats thereof and also except that part lying within the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 32, Range 25, being a part of said Lot 6, Anoka County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Applicant appeared before the Planning Commission for a public hearing on March 27, 2025, and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are available. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the Variance will be in accordance with the objectives of the intent of the Subdivision Code (Chapter 117) of the Ramsey City Code. 2. That the Variance will facilitate a land sale between the City and the Applicant's client in order to use the property in a reasonable manner. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: That the Ramsey Planning Commission hereby grants approval of a variance to Subdivision Code pursuant to Section 117-561 of City Code to allow a meets -and -bounds subdivision of the City's Property as described as Parcel One and Parcel Two above, subject to review and approval as to legal form, and contingent upon the following: 1. A standard -form drainage and utility easement document must be recorded against Parcel One in the area where sanitary sewer and watermain are anticipated. 2. A legal document recorded against Parcel One and the property to the south for cross -access and encroachments of built improvements until such time where Parcel One can be combined with the parcel to the south. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: