My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/02/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/02/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:40:32 AM
Creation date
10/25/2006 11:15:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/02/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilmember Elvig indicated he is fine with the site plan. He suggested a future work session <br />include a discussion of including incentives on projects in the business park to maximize the <br />value of the properties. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Jeffrey, to grant approval of the <br />proposed site plan for Minnesota Waterjet contingent upon compliance with City Staff Review <br />Letter dated September 1, 2006, revised September 22, 2006. <br /> <br />Motion carried. V oting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Jeffrey, Elvig, Olson, <br />Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review of GMI Expansion; Case of Sharp and <br />Associates, LLC <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated Sharp and Associates have applied for site plan review for an <br />expansion to the GMI manufacturing and office facility located at 6511 Bunker Lake Boulevard. <br />The site plan is proposing to construct a 9,920 square foot addition onto GMI's existing facility, <br />which is 10,000 square feet in size. The subject property is 2.3 acres and is located in the E-l <br />Employment District. The addition is proposed to be used for storage and receiving, which are <br />permitted uses in this district. The site plan is meeting all setback requirements, with the <br />exception of the rear yard setback, which is 35 feet in the E-l District. The submitted site plan <br />shows a setback of 20 feet. The applicant has submitted a variance request, which will be <br />considered at the October Board of Adjustment meeting. Ms. Geisler indicated with the <br />expansion, lot coverage on the site will be 19,920 square feet or 19%. The maximum lot <br />coverage permitted by City Code requires one parking stall for every 1,000 square feet of <br />manufacturing/warehouse space and one stall for every 300 square feet of office space. The site <br />plan indicates that the expanded building will consist of 4,000 square feet of office space and <br />15,920 square feet of warehouse space, which requires a total of 29 parking stalls. There are 15 <br />striped parking stalls currently on the site; the site plan indicates there is space for at least 46 <br />parking stalls. Staff is recommending that at least 29 parking stalls be striped once the expansion <br />plans are complete. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler explained the building currently has access on Bunker Lake Boulevard <br />that will be reoriented slightly as part of the expansion. Because Bunker Lake Boulevard is a <br />county road, Anoka County was notified of the site plan submittal. The existing building <br />material consists of painted concrete block. The expansion is also proposed to be painted block. <br />Painted block is not typically permitted in the E-l District but City Code does allow the City <br />Council to approve other materials. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council <br />approve the use of painted block to match the existing building. Ms. Geisler indicated a revised <br />grading and drainage plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Department and some minor <br />revisions are required, as noted in the City Staff Review Letter. The landscaping plan is <br />generally acceptable. Ms. Geisler advised the Planning Commission recommended approval of <br />the site plan, contingent on Council approval of the use of painted block, receipt of a variance to <br />the rear yard setback, and compliance with the City Staff Review Letter. <br /> <br />City Council / September 26, 2006 <br />Page 9 of 38 <br /> <br />P29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.