My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/09/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2024
>
Agenda - Council - 01/09/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 3:42:52 PM
Creation date
4/8/2025 2:42:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/09/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. 1. <br />CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 01/09/2024 <br />Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: Not Applicable <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Settlement Hearing Continuation: Animal violation of Chapter 10 for the keeping of a rooster on property less <br />than 2.5 acres in size, located at 6025 177th Ln NW, Ramsey, MN. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />On August 21, 2023, Mr. Trout was notified of various violations, including the keeping of a rooster on a <br />property less than 2.5 acres in size. Ramsey City Code Chapter 10, Animals, Article I. In General, Section 10-1 <br />regulates the keeping of roosters. The City Code reads "Roosters may be kept and maintained only on parcels of <br />at least two and one-half acres in size. Said properties are allowed a total of two roosters." There are also <br />regulations for enclosure setbacks on property lines. <br />On September 20, 2023, a letter from Ellie Mental Health was submitted to staff indicating the rooster is an <br />emotional support animal for Mrs. Trout. <br />On October 9, 2023, Mr Trout provided a written request for a Settlement Conference. City staff followed the <br />appeal process identified in city code Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 2-332. The process is attached as part of the <br />Settlement Conference Letter sent to Mr. Trout. On October 17, 2023, a Settlement Conference was completed. <br />Mr. Hagen, City Administrator, compiled the details of the meeting and sent a letter of determination to Mr. <br />Trout; summarizing the meeting details and staffs decision to uphold the requirements of the City Code related to <br />the keeping of certain animals, livestock and poultry. The letter with the proposed findings of fact is attached for <br />City Council's review. <br />City Code states that if a final resolution is not agreed upon by the property owner and city, then a settlement <br />hearing will be conducted during a City Council meeting; at which time, a decision by the City Council shall be <br />made to affirm, repeal or modify the order of the city at the conclusion of the conference. On November 28, 2023, <br />the City Council conducted a settlement hearing, at which time, the City Council tabled the item to further <br />discuss the animal regulations set forth in code. <br />At the December 12, 20231 City Council work session, the Council discussed rooster regulations. It was the <br />consensus of the City Council to uphold the current regulations in code which allow the keeping of up to two (2) <br />roosters on properties larger than 2.5 acres in size and to continue the settlement hearing at the January 9, 2024 <br />City Council meeting. <br />During the November 28, 2023 Settlement Hearing, it was shared that a neighboring property owner expressed a <br />negative impact by the rooster's crowing to their family members due to disabilities they have. The city is not <br />legally allowed to request proof of disability from this property owner. <br />To staff s knowledge, there is only one other scenario where a code violation resulted in an emotional support <br />animal discussion. In this case, the violation was for having 13 chickens (all hens) on the property. This <br />property, under code, was allowed six (6) chickens. The code violation began with the Police Department, but <br />was transferred to the Code Enforcement Officer. Through discussions, it was requested the City provide a <br />reasonable accommodation to allow the emotional support animals. Staff, including City Attorney Knaak, felt <br />that the fact the City allowed chickens under code negated a compromise to the number of chickens allowed. The <br />City eventually received a Housing Discrimination Complaint from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.