Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Summary <br />Hydrodynamic devices. <br />If all of these practices were installed, significant volume and pollutant reductions could be <br />accomplished. However, funding limitations and landowner interest make this unlikely. Instead, it is <br />recommended that projects be installed in order of cost-effectiveness (pounds of pollution reduced per <br />dollar spent). Other factors, including a project's educational value/visibility, construction timing, total <br />cost, or non -target pollutant reduction also affect project installation decisions and will need to be <br />weighed by resource managers when selecting projects to pursue. <br />For each type of recommended retrofit, conceptual siting is provided in the project profiles section. The <br />intent of these figures is to provide an understanding of the approach. If a project is selected, site - <br />specific designs must be prepared. In addition, many of the proposed retrofits (e.g. iron -enhanced sand <br />filter pond benches and pond modifications) will require engineered plan sets if selected. This typically <br />occurs after committed partnerships are formed to install the project. Committed partnerships must <br />include willing landowners, both public and private. <br />The 448 acre target study area was divided into 16 catchments and two drainage networks (groups of <br />catchments draining to a common point) based on drainage patterns influenced by topography and <br />stormwater infrastructure. The Mississippi River network consists of seven catchments (320 acres), and <br />the Rum River network consists of nine catchments (128) acres. Based on WinSLAMM model results, <br />the Mississippi River network contributes an estimated 101 acre-feet of runoff, 28,083 pounds of TSS, <br />and 85 pounds of TP annually to the Mississippi River. The Rum River network contributes an estimated <br />61 acre-feet of runoff, 19,764 pounds of TSS, and 63 pounds of TP annually to the Rum River. <br />The tables in the Project Ranking and Selection section (pages 14 - 17) summarize potential projects <br />ranked by cost-effectiveness with respect to either TP or TSS. Potential projects are organized from <br />most cost-effective to least based on pollutants removed. <br />Installation of projects in series will result in lower total treatment than the simple sum of treatment <br />achieved by the individual projects due to treatment train effects. Reported treatment levels are <br />dependent upon optimal site selection and sizing. More detail about each project can be found in the <br />catchment profile pages of this report. Projects that were deemed unfeasible due to prohibitive size, <br />number, or expense were not included in this report. <br />City of Ramsey Stormwater Retrofit Analysis <br />