Laserfiche WebLink
Analytical Process and Elements <br />layers include: 2-foot or finer topography (Light Detection and Ranging [LiDAR] was used for this <br />analysis), surface hydrology, soils, watershed/subwatershed boundaries, parcel boundaries, high - <br />resolution aerial photography and the stormwater drainage infrastructure (with invert elevations). <br />Field investigation is conducted after potential retrofits are identified in the desktop analysis to <br />evaluate each site and identify additional opportunities. During the investigation, the drainage area and <br />surface stormwater infrastructure mapping data were verified. Site constraints were assessed to <br />determine the most feasible retrofit options as well as eliminate sites from consideration. The field <br />investigation may have also revealed additional retrofit opportunities that could have gone unnoticed <br />during the desktop search. <br />Modeling involves assessing multiple scenarios to estimate pollutant loading and potential reductions <br />by proposed retrofits. WinSLAMM (version 10.2.0), which allows routing of multiple catchments and <br />stormwater treatment practices, was used for this analysis. This is important for estimating treatment <br />train effects associated with multiple BMPs in series. Furthermore, it allows for estimation of volume <br />and pollutant loading at the outfall point to the waterbody, which is the primary point of interest in this <br />type of study. <br />WinSLAMM estimates volume and pollutant loading based on acreage, land use, and soils information. <br />Therefore, the volume and pollutant estimates in this report are not waste load allocations, nor does <br />this report serve as a TMDL for the study area. The WinSLAMM model was not calibrated and was only <br />used as an estimation tool to provide relative ranking across potential retrofit projects. Soils throughout <br />the study area were predominantly sandy based on the information available in the Anoka County soil <br />survey. Specific model inputs (e.g. pollutant probability distribution, runoff coefficient, particulate solids <br />concentration, particle residue delivery, and street delivery files) are detailed in Appendix A. <br />The initial step was to create a "base" model which estimates pollutant loading from each catchment in <br />its present-day state without taking into consideration any existing stormwater treatment. To <br />accurately model the land uses in each catchment, drainage area delineations were completed using the <br />watershed delineation tool in ArcSWAT. The drainage areas were then consolidated into catchments <br />using geographic information systems (specifically, ArcGIS). Land use data (based on 2010 Metropolitan <br />Council land use file) were used to calculate acreages of each land use type within each catchment. <br />Each land use polygon classification was compared with 2014 aerial photography and corrected if land <br />use had changed since 2010. This process addressed recent development throughout the study area by <br />reclassifying land use types accordingly. Soil types throughout the subwatershed were modeled as sand <br />and silt in this analysis based on the information available in the Anoka County soil survey. This process <br />resulted in a model that included estimates of the acreage of each type of source area (roof, road, lawn, <br />etc.) in each catchment. <br />Once the "base" model was established, an "existing conditions" model was created by incorporating <br />notable existing stormwater treatment practices in the catchment for which data were available from <br />the City of Ramsey (Figure 1 and Figure 2). For example, street cleaning with mechanical or vacuum <br />street sweepers, stormwater treatment ponds, and others were included in the "existing conditions" <br />model if information was available. <br />City of Ramsey Stormwater Retrofit Analysis <br />