My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/11/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2024
>
Agenda - Council - 06/11/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:15:37 PM
Creation date
4/8/2025 4:02:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/11/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BMP Descriptions <br />Bioretention is a BMP that uses soil and vegetation to treat stormwater runoff from roads, driveways, <br />roof tops, and other impervious surfaces. Differing levels of volume and/or pollutant reductions can be <br />achieved depending on the type of bioretention selected. <br />Bioretention can function as either filtration (biofiltration) or infiltration (bioinfiltration). Biofiltration <br />BMPs are designed with a buried perforated drain the that allows water in the basin to discharge to the <br />stormwater drainage system after having been filtered through the soil. Bioinfiltration BMPs have no <br />underdrain, ensuring that all water that enters the basins will either infiltrate into the soil or be <br />evapotranspired into the air. Bioinfiltration provides 100% retention and treatment of captured <br />stormwater, whereas biofiltration basins provide excellent removal of particulate contaminants but <br />limited removal of dissolved contaminants, such as DP (Table 6). <br />Table 6: Matrix describing curb -cut rain garden efficacy for pollutant removal based on type. <br />Curb -cut TSS .. DPSize o Design <br />Rain Garden Area <br />Type Removal ,Remov'JaJemovJa11 1eduction Treated L Notes <br />A Id A A <br />Optimal sites are low enough <br />in the landscape to capture <br />Bioinfiltration High High High High High most of the watershed but <br />high enough to ensure <br />adequate separation from <br />the water table for treatment <br />purposes. Higher soil <br />Biofiltration High Moderate Low Low High infiltration rates allow for <br />deeper basins and may <br />eliminate the need for <br />underdrains. <br />The treatment efficacy of a particular bioretention project depends on many factors, including but not <br />limited to the pollutant of concern, the quality of water entering the project, the intensity and duration <br />of storm events, project size, position of the project in the landscape, existing downstream treatment, <br />soil and vegetation characteristics, and project type (i.e. bioinfiltration or biofiltration). Optimally, new <br />bioretention will capture water that would otherwise discharge into a priority waterbody untreated. <br />The volume and pollutant removal potential of each bioretention practice was estimated using <br />WinSLAMM. In order to calculate cost -benefit, the cost of each project had to be estimated. To fully <br />estimate the cost of project installation, labor costs for project outreach and promotion, project design, <br />project administration, and project maintenance over the anticipated life of the practice were <br />considered in addition to actual construction costs. If multiple projects were installed, cost savings <br />could be achieved on the administration and promotion costs (and possibly the construction costs for a <br />large and competitive bid). <br />Please note infiltration examples included in this section would require site specific investigations to <br />verify soils are appropriate for infiltration. <br />City of Ramsey Stormwater Retrofit Analysis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.