Agenda - Council - 04/22/2025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #25-079 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR MSA ALPINE DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #25-03 WHEREAS, the City of Ramsey proposes to reconstruct Municipal State Aid (MSA) Alpine Drive between Sunfish Lake Boulevard (CR 57) and Saint Francis Boulevard (TH 47) as identified within the 2025 — 2034 Capital Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ramsey City Council Resolution #24-198, adopted July 23, 2024, the City Council accepted and awarded the proposal to Hakanson Anderson for topographic survey of the project area in the amount of $4,800.00; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ramsey City Council Resolution #24-220, adopted August 12, 2024, the City Council accepted and awarded the proposal to Independent Testing Technologies, Inc., for a geotechnical report of the project area in the amount of $10,620.00; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ramsey City Council Resolution #24-310, adopted November 12, 2024, the City Council accepted and awarded the proposal to Hydro-Klean, LLC, for sewer cleaning and televising of the project area in the amount of $9,130.16; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ramsey City Council Resolution #24-339, adopted November 26, 2024, the City Council ordered the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for MSA Alpine Drive Reconstruction, Improvement Project #25-03; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the purpose of advertising for bids for MSA Alpine Drive, Improvement Project #25-03. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1) The Ramsey City Council hereby approves plans and specifications prepared by the City Engineer and authorizes advertisement for bids for said improvements as City Improvement Project #25-03, MSA Alpine Drive Reconstruction, Improvement Project #25-03. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: