Laserfiche WebLink
10. That Loa 1 is a corner lot and thus, should be at least seventy-five (75) feet in width; <br />however, -the Applicant is proposing to provide approximately ten (10) additional feet to <br />proposes;, Lot 3 (about 76 feet in width), to move that home further back from Highway <br />10). <br />1 <br />11. That City Code Section 106-430 (Bulk Standards) specifies a setback of sixty (60) feet <br />from artc_:ia1 roadways. <br />12. That to the Zoning Code update, the setback from arterial roadways was sixty (60) <br />feet from the centerline of the arterial road, plus the applicable local setback (so in this <br />case, 60 feet from the centerline of Highway 10 right-of-way plus 20 feet, which is the <br />minimumrequired side setback from a right-of-way). <br />13. That the ttal right-of-way width of Highway 10 adjacent to the Subject Property is <br />approxir_c.itely 200 feet, so as proposed, the required side setback (street side) for Lot 3 <br />under th • previous Zoning Code standards would have been twenty (20) feet. <br />14. That tit. Applicant appeared before the Planning Commission for a public hearing <br />pursuant Ro Section 106-220 (Variances) of the Ramsey City Code on April 25, 2024, and <br />that said E:ublic hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing <br />are availi ale. <br />15. That the Subject Property is located within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area <br />Overlay .District (and more specifically in the CA -SR [Critical Area — Separated from <br />River] district) and thus, Staff sent notice the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources <br />(MN DI'.1R) regarding the Minor Plat. <br />16. That the ,:lubject Property abuts Highway 10 and thus, Staff sent notice to the Minnesota <br />Departn,J Jit of Transportation (MnDOT). <br />17. That the: Applicant has submitted a Noise Study due to the proximity to Highway 10, <br />which itxicates that with proper construction methods and materials, the site can comply <br />with staw,noise regulations. <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />That the Piat will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br />property. <br />2. That the Minor Plat will not unreasonably increase the congestion on the public street. <br />3. That the Minor Plat will not have the effect of allowing any use prohibited in the R-1 B <br />Single Emily Residential District. <br />RESOLUTION #24-108 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />