Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />LMC information memos: <br />Taking the Mystery out of <br />Findings of Fact; Zoning <br />Decisions. <br />Minn. Stat. § 15.17. <br />Minn. Stat. § 138.225. <br />Minn. Stat. §§ 138.161-.21. <br />A.G. Op. 851F (Feb. 5, <br />1973). See Handbook, <br />Records Management. <br />See LMC information <br />memos, Taking the Mystery <br />out of Findings of Fact; Land <br />Use Findings of Fact: Elected <br />Officials as Policy makers <br />and Zoning Decisions. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.354, subd. <br />1. <br />Minn. Stat. § 410.12. <br />See Handbook, The Horne <br />Rule Charter City. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.355, subd. <br />3. <br />In land use cases, Minnesota courts look for a sufficient statement of the <br />reasons given by the city to grant or deny a request. The role of the court is to <br />examine the city's reasons and ascertain whether the record before the city <br />council supports them. The reasons given by the city must be legally <br />sufficient and have a factual basis. <br />Minnesota case law and statutory law demand that the reasons for a city's <br />decision on a land use case be articulated in the official record. Written <br />findings of fact, and conclusions of law are required whenever an application <br />is denied. In addition, written findings of fact and conclusions of law are <br />strongly recommended whenever a decision or recommendation related to a <br />land use decision is made. Findings of fact and creating accurate records are <br />discussed at length in the LMC Information Memo "Zoning Guide for <br />Cities." <br />3. Records retention requirements <br />State law limits the ability of cities, including city planning commissions, to <br />dispose of or destroy city records. <br />Cities must retain records that they receive or create according to its records <br />retention schedule. It is a crime to destroy such records without statutory <br />authority. <br />Maintaining adequate records is also vital for defending the city's land use <br />decisions in a court of law. Planning commissioners should work with city <br />staff to determine which records must be retained. <br />V. Changing the structure or abolishing the <br />planning commission <br />A. Abolishing the planning commission <br />State statute provides that planning commissions created by ordinance may <br />be abolished by two-thirds vote of all the members of the governing body. <br />Planning commissions created by city charter can be abolished by following <br />the statutory provisions for amending a city charter. <br />Cities considering abolishing their planning commission should seek the <br />advice of their city attorney. While state statute allows cities to abolish their <br />planning commission, state statute also vests planning commissions with <br />mandatory duties related to: <br />• Reviewing amendments to the comprehensive plan. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: <br />Planning Commission Guide <br />12/16/2024 <br />Page 22 <br />