11/12/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

. . . earlier this evening; that only a variance to structure location is required. Ms. Norris stated that the pro[X>sed findings of fact would have to be amended as follows: 1) Reword Item U as follows: ''!hat the applicant has applied for a Board of Adjustment variance to construct in the front yard. 2) Omit Items #'s 5, 6, 16, 17 and 18. Motion ~ Councilmember Sorteberg and seconded ~ Councilmanber Reimann to adopt Findings of Fact 0127, as amended, regarding Mr. Newcomb's request for a variance for an accessory structure. (Please refer to findings of fact file for Findings of Fact 0127). Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Schlueter, Mayor Heitman, Councilmanbers Sorteberg, Cox and Reimann. Voting No: None. Motion by Councilmember Sortebeg and seconded by Councilmanber Cox to approve Mr. Roy Newcomb's request for a variance to construct an accessory structure in his front yard contingent u[X>n Mr. Newcomb entering into a developnent agreement wi th the Ci ty . Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Schlueter, Mayor Heitman, Councilrnembers Sorteberg, Cox and Reimann. Voting No: None. ['Lise #3 ~ Reauest For Reconsideration Of Variance FQr AccessQrv S~ructure Lar9~r !ltlan Allow~d ~ Ci tv Code: Case Of Mr. And Mrs. Steven Johnson: Mrs. Johnson was present and stated that their original request was for a 1,280 square foot galvanized metal building; they will limi t the size to 1,000 square feet which will be consistent with the amended ordinance adopted earlier this evening; the amended ordinance adopted eliminates metal accessory structures on parcels 2-1/2 acres or less; options are to request a variance to material types or withdraw the variance application and request a refund. Mr. Goodrich noted that the amended ordinance does not become effective for 30 days; the Johnson's could apply for a building permit for a metal structure but the size limit would be 624 square feet. Mrs. Johnson stated that she would like to withdraw her variance application and requested that her $90.00 be refunded. Motion ~ Councilmanber Reimann and seconded by Mayor Hei bnan authorizing that Mr. and Mrs. Steven Johnson receive a $90.00 variance application refund should they choose to withdraw their request. Further Discussion: Councilrnember Cox noted that his · no' vote regarding the intial Council action on this case was based on the material type being metal. Mayor Hei bnan stated that in Council's ini tial action on this request, he voted in sup[X>rt of the request; at that time material type was not a consideration but now it is by virtue of the amended ordinance. November 12, 1985 Page 2 of 3