Laserfiche WebLink
Q15. Can the city require employees to use other paid <br />leave to supplement the Minnesota Paid Leave <br />program benefits? <br />A15. No. The law explicitly states that employers cannot require employees use their accrued <br />paid time off to supplement any benefits they receive from the Minnesota Paid Leave program. <br />However, the law allows, but does not require, the city to supplement the payments available <br />under this program by allowing the employee to use paid leave in addition to the paid benefits <br />available under the new program. Recall in Q3, the Minnesota Paid Leave benefit is progressive <br />and varies based on an employee's weekly wages. A city allowing employees to use <br />supplemental benefits (such as sick leave, vacation, PTO and short-term disability) to "top off" <br />Minnesota Paid Leave payments provides employees with the opportunity to be made "whole" <br />in many cases through much of their leave period, and simultaneously draws down accrued <br />leave liabilities for a city. That said, an employee's supplemental benefits combined with <br />Minnesota Paid Leave may not exceed the employees' pre -leave wages. For additional <br />information on short-term disability/long-term disability impacts, refer to Q20. The city should <br />consult with the city attorney to determine if there are other policies, collective bargaining <br />agreements, or state or federal laws that might require or prohibit this. Also see Q17. <br />In some cases, if an employer provides an employee wage replacement during an absence, and <br />the total of Minnesota Paid Leave benefits and any supplemental benefits exceed the <br />employee's usual salary, the employee must refund the excess to either the employer or DEED. <br />If an employer provides wage replacement benefits to an employee for a week that should have <br />been paid by DEED, then DEED may reimburse the employer directly. <br />Return to top of page <br />Q16. Can the city require the employee to use city <br />leave first before accessing this program? <br />A16. No. The city cannot require the employee to use paid leave first before applying for <br />benefits under this new program. However, an employee can choose to use vacation, sick, or <br />paid time off, or disability insurance payments in lieu of the state paid leave program. During <br />the period of time the employee is using city paid leaves instead of the Minnesota Paid Leave <br />program, they are entitled to the employment protections of the law. <br />If the city runs FMLA concurrently with paid leave under this program, that time would likely <br />reduce the amount of leave available to the employee under the state's paid leave benefits, <br />although the state is ultimately responsible for making an eligibility determination decision. In <br />response to an application for benefits under the Minnesota Paid Leave program, the state is <br />responsible for issuing an eligibility determination regarding the amount of benefits available <br />to the applicant. Cities must exercise caution to not interfere with or retaliate against an <br />employee for exercising their rights under the Minnesota Paid Leave law. <br />Return to top of page <br />Q17. How will this impact collective bargaining <br />agreements (CBAs)? <br />A17. The law does not preclude employers from bargaining with unions with respect to leave <br />benefits and related procedures and employee protections, as long as they meet or exceed, and <br />do not otherwise conflict with, the minimum standards and requirements in the law. Many <br />