Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Management that Waste Management provide for remedial action <br />on the existing landfill site. Waste Management's way of <br />protecting itself was to propose an environmental improvement <br />plan -- Waste Management proposed an infiltration barrier on <br />the north slope to minimize rainfall into the existing site. <br />By doing this we would slope the collection system off to the <br />new area to the north and put in a liner to collect leachate <br />generated from the old and new site. Mr. Otter stated that <br />Waste Management's proposal would not dnlybe adding dollars <br />to Ramsey's budget but it's future as it relates to the remedial <br />action within the proposal. Waste Management is proposing <br />$15,000,000 for remedial action; State~Super Fund money is <br />available for remedial action but there is no guarantee that <br />the money will be there or Ramsey will qualify when the time <br />comes. Waste Management's proposal is conditioned on the <br />conditional use permit for expansion being granted. Mr. Otter <br />then distributed copies of Waste Management's letter dated <br />July 3, 1984 to the Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission (see <br />Attachment III). <br /> <br />Chairman Greenberg inquired as to the status of Site P, does <br />Waste Management's proposal include the area designated as <br />Site P, and who controls SiteP if it is selected. <br /> <br />Mr. Otter replied that the Waste Managem~nt Act requires <br />counties to have provided sufficient airspace to handle their <br />refuse and Site P has been included in this County's siting <br />process. Final site selection will be by the Metro Council <br />but Anoka County is going to be out of airspace prior to agency <br />action. Waste Management's proposal is to operate in the North <br />or start phasing of what will be part of the total site <br />eventually, Site P. Site P will probably be one of the selected <br />sites in Anoka County because of it's location, environmental <br />and intrinsic suitability. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that if Site P is selected, basically, the <br />County would have control of the property. <br /> <br />Case 1F3: Ramsey Economic Development Company: <br /> <br />Chairman Greenberg requested that the EDC Economic Subcommittee <br />prepare recommendations regarding printing and marketing of <br />stock. <br /> <br />Case 1F4: Subcommittee Reports: <br /> <br />No action. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Muller and seconded by Commissioner Fults <br />to adjourn this regular meeting of the Ramsey Economic Development <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Greenberg, Commissioners <br /> <br />EDCjJuly 11, 1984 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />