Laserfiche WebLink
job of staying in their own area for parking. He commented that many of the other users require <br />much less parking, noting that one of the other tenants in this space only has three employees. <br />Chairperson Gengler referenced the rear entrance and asked if there would be signage. <br />Mr. Kuker confirmed that he would recommend signage at that door. <br />Mr. Langmade commented that they do have plans for signage. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if there would only be signage on the building. <br />Mr. Hanratty confirmed that they would have two signs, one on the front and one on the south <br />side, facing Highway 10. <br />Mr. Langmade provided details on the court surfacing that will provide a comfortable experience <br />for users. <br />Commissioner Rudack asked about the plans for illumination of the signs, being mindful of the <br />nearby residential property. <br />Mr. Kuker explained how the illumination is done to ensure people can see it at night while not <br />being intrusive. <br />Mr. Hanratty replied that the lit sign would face the industrial area and not the residential. <br />Commissioner Musgrove asked if there would be parking lot lights. <br />Mr. Kuker confirmed that there are parking lot lights already. <br />Citizen Innut <br />No additional comments. <br />Motion by Commissioner Musgrove, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Musgrove, Anderson, Bauer, <br />Lubarski, and Rudack. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner VanScoy. <br />Chairperson Gengler closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Musgrove asked a clarifying question regarding whether the conditions listed in the <br />staff report needed to be stated as part of the motion, or if they were included in the resolution. <br />Planning Commission/ May 22, 2025 <br />Page 5 of 13 <br />