Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion by Councilmember Jeffrey, seconded by Councilmember Pearson, that the next Finance <br />Committee includes a case to review the chain of authority, the process of approving <br />expenditures that exceed the approved amount, and how not-to-exceed amounts are <br />communicated with vendors. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Strommen, Councilmembers Jeffrey and Pearson. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Elvig. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Discuss Acquisition of Boike Property <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman indicated this is a topic the Finance Committee has discussed many <br />times. The Boike property is a critical piece of property as part of the Northeast River Crossing <br />Corridor. The Committee has reviewed various purchase agreements as well as a joint powers <br />agreement with Anoka County and has discussed how to finance this project. The Committee <br />ran into difficulty the last couple of months with the financing. The Committee most recently <br />looked at a five year bond with a balloon, but the difficulty was that this summer they saw a drop <br />in the amount of building permits. This had serious effects on the budget this year and next year, <br />and they are unable to put this purchase into the budget. Mr. Norman noted that the Committee <br />and Council have expressed a desire to control this corridor. Staff has looked at different <br />methods of financing the acquisition of this property. The City will likely eventually have <br />greater powers if the correction to the port authority legislation passes. Additionally it can be <br />determined if the purchase can be financed through TIF. In addition to this, an unresolved <br />question is what guarantee the City has that this purchase may be eligible in the future for RALF <br />funding once the corridor has been officially mapped. If the parcel is not eligible for RALF <br />funds it will be eligible to be purchased by the Department of Transportation when the project <br />goes forward, but that could be 15 to 20 years from now. <br /> <br />Jodi Reuhle, The Tinklenberg Group, reviewed that The Tinklenberg Group was hired to work <br />with another technical firm to look at access improvements and develop conceptual designs. The <br />Council has seen the designs that illustrate this property would be taken in its entirety. It is <br />important to note they started that work in Spring 2005. She met Mr. Boike at the open house <br />where these concepts were rolled out in August 2005. She explained she is stating this to <br />illustrate how patient and cooperative these folks have been. <br /> <br />Mr. Boike stated he received a letter dated July 5,2001, which was sent to him along with other <br />folks regarding the affected area that would be under study and moratorium. Mr. Norman and <br />Mayor Gamec signed this letter, so they are familiar with the situation with him that goes back <br />almost five years. He has not been able to do anything significant with this property because of <br />the moratorium. He believes it was year 3 when he called the city planner to discuss if there <br />would be another letter to follow up to this letter telling him if he was free to build or do <br />anything, and he was told no. At that point he assumed his land would be a target. Mr. Boike <br />stated in April 2004, he had several developers come to him wanting to purchase the property. <br />They understood the corridor would go through his land, but to what extent they were not sure. <br />He sold the property in April 2005 but there was a four month due diligence period that ended <br />August 1, 2005, when Jodi put out an announcement that there would be an open house and <br />some viewing of plans as it relates to the upgrades planned. At that point the buyer said this will <br /> <br />Finance Committee / September 26, 2006 <br />Page 4 of8 <br />