My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/26/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/26/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 9:39:27 AM
Creation date
8/29/2025 9:46:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/29/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion by Commissioner Musgrove, seconded by Commissioner Rudack, to approve the consent <br />agenda as presented. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Musgrove, Rudack, <br />Anderson, Bauer, and Lubarski. Voting No: None. Abstaining: Commissioner VanScoy. Absent: <br />None. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />6.01: Public Hearing: Consider a Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Variance for <br />Drive -Through in the Front Yard in the COR-2b Zoning District for Chipotle at <br />14701 Armstrong Blvd NW <br />Public HearinE <br />Chairperson Gengler called the public hearing to order at 7:02 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />City Planner Martin presented the staff report stating that staff recommend approval of the <br />Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, and Variance. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if there would be plans to extend the fence the length of the <br />driveway along Sunwood. <br />City Planner Martin replied that staff had discussions with the applicant related to items that could <br />be within the easement area. He stated that the location of the underground pipe would prevent <br />the fence from going too much farther to the west. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if a variance is requested from the framework requirement. <br />City Planner Martin replied that a variance from the framework requirement was not requested. <br />Commissioner Lubarski referenced the crosswalk with two-way traffic and asked if there would <br />be a mirror to provide safer crossing. <br />City Planner Martin replied that it is one-way traffic and there would be signs for the crosswalk to <br />alert drivers. <br />Commissioner Bauer stated that it is his understanding that the fence was a safety barrier between <br />the sidewalk and traffic, and therefore agreed with Commissioner VanScoy that the fencing should <br />be extended. <br />Commissioner Anderson recognized that the City does not like bare walls and asked if there have <br />been conversations to improve the aesthetic of that wall. <br />Planning Commission/ June 26, 2025 <br />Page 2 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.