My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/10/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2006
>
Minutes - Council - 10/10/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:14:18 PM
Creation date
12/6/2006 11:21:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Committee by requiring a written petition for the desired change signed by 5 property owners or <br />residents residing within 500 feet from the requested modification. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Olson, Cook, Jeffrey, <br />Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />4) Discuss Mississippi Subdrainage District No.1 Phase 2 Construction Project <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson reviewed that an ordinance was adopted on February 22, 2000, that <br />established the Mississippi Drainage District to address the storm sewer needs for the area. The <br />ordinance established a special taxing district to finance necessary drainage improvements which <br />would allow the district to handle additional storm runoff caused by the development of the area <br />within the district. In fall of 2000, storm sewer was installed through the eastern half of the <br />district. The western half of the district had anticipated the extension of this storm sewer once <br />appropriate drainage and utility easements were obtained. Mr. Olson indicated there are three <br />property owners the City has yet to acquire easements from. Two of these easements were <br />anticipated to be donated by the property owners to facilitate the construction. The third <br />easement was appraised at a value of $13,500 and Council authorized an offer to be extended to <br />the property owner in this amount. Staff has contacted the remaining two property owners <br />several times over the intervening months to obtain these easements, but has been unsuccessful <br />in obtaining them. During the last conversation with one of the property owners, Mr. Larry <br />Hickman, he indicated a preference for the easement to be obtained through a purchase. Staff <br />estimates that the value of this easement could be as much as $144,050 if the same unit price <br />land values which were identified for the appraised property were applied to Mr. Hickman's <br />property. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson advised currently the cost of the phase 2 project is estimated at <br />$266,300 with $40,000 for property acquisition. The district currently has a fund balance of <br />$142,800 with anticipated 2007 revenue of $43,348. To proceed with this project at this time in <br />light of the significantly increased land acquisition cost would require either a significant <br />increase in the levy to this special district or an extension of the levy period for as many as six <br />years. The purpose for this project as stated within the CIP is twofold. First it will provide <br />drainage capacity to the western portion of the drainage district so that it can facilitate future <br />development, and second it provides an outlet for the large regional pond which accepts the <br />drainage from Business Park 95 and the eastern portion of the Mississippi Subdrainage District <br />No.1. Plans for the upgrade of Highway 10 will require the eventual acquisition of the property <br />within this district and this improvement would likely increase the value of the property and <br />consequently the cost of the acquisition. Mr. Olson advised Mr. Hickman, who has indicated a <br />preference for the easement to be obtained through a purchase, would be able to increase his <br />display area without creating large ponds on his property, so there is some value involved. Mr. <br />Olson advised the discussion at the Committee related to the following three options for <br />consideration: <br />1. Pursue the project at this time and increase the annual levy to the district to recover the <br />project costs. Alternately the project costs could be recovered over a six-year period at <br />the present levy. <br /> <br />City Council / October 10, 2006 <br />Page 11 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.