My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/12/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 12/12/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:56:53 PM
Creation date
12/8/2006 3:45:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/12/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer Jankowski replied he does not believe so. This policy is more to provide Council <br />with some flexibility to respond to citizen requests for street lights at particular locations that <br />have some need. <br />Public Works Director Olson advised there is a need for street lighting in the City, especially <br />within Town Center and Sunwood Drive. The plan would likely be similar to in years past, <br />which would be for staff to come to the City Council or Public Works Committee and <br />recommend the expenditure for the year's allotment of street lights. If requests come in they <br />would be prioritized into the next year's budget. This will ensure that the funds are utilized for <br />the intended purpose. <br />Councilmember Olson commented as the City grows street lighting will always be an issue and a <br />fund will always be needed for this sort of thing. The budgeted amount may need to be reviewed <br />if the growth in the City picks up speed. <br />Motion by. Councilmember Olson, seconded by Councilinember. Cook, to recommend to the City <br />Council- that the attached revised Street Lighting Policy be adopted. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Elvig, Councilmembers Olson and Cook. Voting No: <br />None. <br />Case #4: Report on Crosswalks Across County Roadways <br />•City Engineer eer Jankowski reviewed that at the September 19, 2006 Public Works Committee <br />� <br />meeting discussion was initiated on how crosswalks should be marked at crossings of Anoka <br />County highways. Staff has learned that Anoka County Highway Department policy regarding <br />crosswalks is as follows: <br />• Signalized intersections have crosswalk pavement markings, which are installed and <br />maintained by the County. <br />• All way stop intersections may be marked with crosswalk pavement markings but do not <br />require warning signs. If the City wishes to have any of these crossing marked, <br />installation and maintenance of the crossing would be at City expense. <br />• Intersections on which County traffic does not stop would be subject to a review on a <br />case by case basis. The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control provides guidance <br />that states "Crosswalks lines should not be used indiscriminately. An engineering study <br />should be performed before they are installed at locations away from traffic signals or <br />STOP signs." <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated a review of the existing trail system within the City shows <br />that there are five signalized intersections on County roads where crosswalks are marked. These <br />locations include; CR 116/Dysprosium St; CR 56/Sr inters s <br />/CRI 6;whereCounty roads 1 c <br />/TH47; and <br />CSAR county <br />47. In addition, two trail crossings are located <br />have a stop condition. These locations include CR 57/Alpine Dr. and CR57 and CR 116. In <br />addition the intersection of CSAH 5 and Alpine Dr is anticipated to meet warrants for an all way <br />i stop. <br />Public Works Committee / October 17, 2006 <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />—175— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.