Agenda - Council - 10/14/2025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CC Regular Session Meeting Date: Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: 5. 9. 10/14/2025 Create a positive image for residential neighborhoods, business districts and key corridors. Title: Adopt Resolution #25-226 Approving a Variance to Lot Width for the proposed plat of "OShaughnessy 3rd Addition" at 17201 St. Francis Blvd. NW. Purpose/Background: The property at 17201 St. Francis Boulevard consists of two parcels totaling 34 acres and contains a single-family home with an accessory building. Access to the house and accessory building currently comes from St. Francis Boulevard. The applicant has provided a sketch plan, the first step in the Major Plat process, that was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 28, intending to subdivide the property into four lots --three fronting St. Francis Boulevard and one fronting Germanium Street. . The sketch plan is a high-level review before the preliminary plat submittal is made. The property is zoned RR --Rural Residential with the eastern portion having the Scenic River Protection Overlay. All four of the proposed lots meet the minimum required 2.5 acres of lot area. During staffs review, it was noted that one of the lots, Lot 2 (the proposed lot containing the existing home and accessory building), does not have the required 200 feet of lot width, resulting in a "flag lot" of about 109 feet in width. Lot width is measured at the minimum front setback, which is 40 feet back from the front property line. The property has 713 feet of lot width today, though approximately 136 feet of that is encumbered by a transmission line easement. Staff suggested that a slight adjustment of the south line and a larger adjustment of the north property line of proposed Lot 2 would result in three conforming lots along St. Francis Boulevard. The applicant insisted upon the proposed lot configuration and then included a variance request in the application (attached to this case). The applicant's letter did not include any "practical difficulties," or legal variance justifications, as outlined in City Code Section 106-220. Staffs recommendation was to deny the variance based on a lack of identified practical difficulties and that the lots could conform. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 28 to consider the variance and provide feedback on the sketch plan. The Commission unanimously voted to deny the variance for the reason staff identified. At the meeting, the applicant noted that he would like the lots that he is proposing to sell be wider than the 200 feet required by Code to allow for more space. The City Council heard the appeal on September 23 and voted to direct staff to prepare a resolution overturning the Planning Commission's variance approving the variance based on that the lot width is in charector with other properties in the neighborhood. Notification: The public hearing was conducted at the Planning Commission meeting on August 28 in the typical manner. Funding Source: All costs associated with the proposed development are the responsibility of the applicant. Recommendation: The attached resolution is based on Council direction given at the September 23 City Council meeting.