My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/28/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2025
>
Agenda - Council - 10/28/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2025 4:50:23 PM
Creation date
10/28/2025 1:49:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/28/2025
Supplemental fields
Year
%(Da
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
379
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Senior Planner Anderson shared that through his research he believes the last RFP was done before <br />the initial contract for service was signed which was in the early 1990s. He noted that direction <br />since he has been on Staff has always been to negotiate with ACE since everything had always <br />worked well with them. He stated they normally will survey other cities around to see what prices <br />they pay for recycling; however, it is a hard comparison to make as each city handles recycling <br />and trash services differently. <br />Councilmember Stewart asked about the risk associated with doing an RFP. <br />Senior Planner Anderson noted that ACE would be allowed to submit a bid and he assumes that <br />they would. <br />Councilmember Buscher added that there are only a few services in the area that offer recycling <br />services so the bid process would likely not take a very long time. <br />Senior Planner Anderson shared that there are currently eight to ten licensed recycling haulers in <br />the City; however, some only do commercial properties or apartment buildings. He added that <br />services that are not currently licensed in the City can still submit a bid. <br />Councilmember Specht asked if they moved to an open hauling system if they would still require <br />each hauler to report the tonnage of recycling that they collect so it can be reported to the County. <br />Senior Planner Anderson noted that the reporting would take more administrative time in an open <br />hauler system to track this information down. He added that they would also have to update City <br />Code to make it very clear that reporting is mandatory and failure to report could result in the <br />revocation of their license to operate in the City. He explained that if they were with an open hauler <br />system then the education on what can and cannot be recycled becomes more generalized as each <br />hauler will have different standards for what they will and will not pick up. <br />City Administrator Hagen asked how organics recycling would come into play with this. He asked <br />if this has to be available to residents through a County requirement. <br />Senior Planner Anderson said this is not yet a requirement; however, beginning in 2030, the seven - <br />county metro will have to have an option for curbside organics recycling per a State mandate. He <br />shared that they currently have an organics drop-off space at Public Works. <br />Mayor Heineman asked if the last time they extended this contract it was for another five years. <br />Senior Planner Anderson said yes. <br />Mayor Heineman said that he has experience with RFPs for work and he does not like them as <br />they end up paying more in the end because the companies have to build into this contract what <br />they estimate their costs will be in five years. He noted that the longer the term of the contract, the <br />more waste there is built in to accommodate for inflation and other unknowns. He asked if they <br />have ever done a year -by -year contract. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.