Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Blakemore stated the developer must have side a omm ssioner that thereewould havego be <br />was discussed and it was stated after the meeting by <br />a good reason to rezone this land from commercial to residential. <br />Chairperson Nixt explained the applicant has wor eedoestnothwant t to betmadeto appear that <br />reviewed and up for approval and consideration. H <br />the City has modified their policies or procedures to accommodate this applicant, which is not <br />the case to his knowledge. <br />Mr. Blakemore stated the Commission informed weed and thatait should be rewo k dat The <br />residents of the area do not like what has been propos <br />applicant has reworked the plan into three different proposals, but there was no inclusion of any <br />of the residents in the process. <br />Chairperson Nixt explained the process was followed; if the residents have more interest there <br />are established office hours to meet with staff. <br />Commissioner Brauer stated the minutes of the meetin gdw~ eb this ood reason for ite andflt could <br />statement that for him to say yes to this, there would ne g <br />not just be for monetary gain. That statement was his personal position, not the position of the <br />rest of the Commission. In addition, he thinks Chairperson Con~inhia a ont is whether tha sit elis <br />in that this is a challenged site. The question for the <br />challenged enough that the Commission is willo geowil differeon hag bssue,sandesom~e of h's <br />any other way to develop the site. Good pe p <br />colleagues may feel there is nothing else that can be done with this site, and that this is the best <br />use of the site. <br />Mr. Roy Hillyard, 13711 and 13718 Dolomite Street NWoutri to sustain three resider ialiautielll~ <br />adjacent to this property. He understands this lot is large g <br />under single family zoning, and he would be okay with that. <br />Mr. Lero Kessler, 6774 137` Avenue NW, stated there have been quie~ f J stthe otheriday he <br />Y <br />neighborhood because of the development put in to the northwest o <br />had someone come up on his sidewalk in broad daylightl shut b the tiiiiehhes got there they were <br />before yesterday someone came up and ranthgat the onever had before. He is in favor of a business <br />gone. This is a problem that is happening Y <br />going here, and does not agree that a business will not work there. <br />Ms. Defore, 6166 Rivlyn Street NW, stated she has lived in this s not woan~any moreymultifamily <br />have had all kinds of trouble with the townliomes, and she doe <br />or townhomes. She took her grandchild to the park in he ark toda anThey could p ti in a dentist <br />they need money or they will not be able to play in the p Y <br />office or small business here, and all the buildings leaving the north side of Highway 10 will be <br />looking for a place to go. <br />Planning Commission/September 7, 2006 <br />Page 8 of 20 <br />-214- <br />