My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/28/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 12/28/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:57:53 PM
Creation date
12/21/2006 3:38:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/28/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
417
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Nixt indicated the overall site plan will not change substantially as a result of <br />the findings that maybe obtained from additional soils testing. <br />Mr. Walz stated they have been given the requirement to do additional testing to dig one <br />8-foot test pit for every 10,000 square feet of septic system. The proposed septic system <br />is only 2,400 square feet; the total square footage would be less than 10,000 square feet, <br />so essentially. they only need do to one test. He stated they have done eight test pits <br />throughout the two different properties to determine the best site for the septic system. <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the testing was done through a qualified and certified <br />subcontractor who was approved to make the soil assessments. <br />Mr. Walz replied he had received notification on Wednesday evening that they needed a <br />report submitted within 72 hours. He contacted a licensed soil scientist. This individual, <br />the septic designer and himself conducted the test as a team with a backhoe. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the report meets $ie requirements of the Engineering <br />Department to make a determination regarding the septic system. <br />City Engineer Jankowski explained the report includes the results of the soil test; there <br />are no septic designs attached to the report. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes indicated the report states that the results are inconclusive and <br />that more testing needs to be done for verification. The report does not stand by the <br />assertion that this soil will 100% support a septic system; the report calls for more testing. <br />Chairperson Nixt noted if the soil is not acceptable for a conventional system there are <br />other types of system designs, but they would drive the cost up considerably. <br />Mr. Vick Hagenah, Septic System Designer, described the location and results of soil <br />borings and test pits He thinks the soil is very sound in this location. He walked the <br />whole area and didn't see anything really disruptive. <br />Chairperson Nixt requested an estimate of the size of drain field that would be needed. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes indicated she has talked to Steve Lutmer and Mike McDowell <br />about the drain field. Mr. Lutmer uses the U of M estimated flow rate chart. The sizing <br />estimated by Mr. Hagenah is pretty cld to the estimated number of employee 2,200 <br />possibility of more employees bemg adde <br />square feet would be a good estimate for the size of the drain field. <br />Chairperson Nixt asked how many square feet are available to locate the 2,200 square <br />foot estimated drain field and Associate Planner Dalnes replied approximately one acre. <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated he would not hold the approval up with 50,000 square feet of <br />available space to site a 2,200 square foot drain field. This issue clearly needs to be <br />-275- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.