Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee <br />Meeting Date: 12/16/2025 <br />Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: <br />5. 5. <br />Create a positive image for residential neighborhoods, business districts and key <br />corridors. <br />Title: <br />Discuss Repairing Irrigation Damage Associated with Improvement Projects <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider recommending repairing irrigation damage associated with improvement <br />projects. <br />Background: <br />The typical street reconstruction project will impact the boulevard within 6 to 8 feet from the existing edge of <br />pavement or back of curb. In both urban and rural settings, the city includes repairing any damage caused to <br />existing driveways, landscaping, turf, mail boxes, retaining walls (essentially any visible infrastructure) within the <br />public right-of-way. In rural settings any private driveway culverts are considered the home -owners responsibility <br />to maintain; if the project necessarily impacts a driveway culvert the city does repair as part of the improvement <br />project. <br />Since 2017, the city has put the responsibility to repair any damage caused to underground irrigation and/or <br />invisible dog fences during the reconstruction projects on the property owner. This change in practice was a <br />reaction to the difficulties with irrigation repairs during 2015 and 2016 improvement projects. The primary driver <br />was the number of staff hours inspecting the irrigation system functionality after the project was complete. <br />Since 2017, staff has included notices in the project update letters that private lawn irrigation systems may be <br />impacted by the work and that relocating and/or repairing private irrigation systems within public right of ways as <br />needed to accommodate construction is the responsibility of the property owner. During construction, because the <br />irrigation systems are not visible, at least some impacts are unavoidable. During the first few construction <br />seasons after 2017, this typically generated a few conversations on each project with property owners to clarify <br />the policy. <br />In general, with the city's primarily sandy soils, irrigation is necessary to maintain a quality turf lawn, which is <br />often desired for better curb appeal. Commercial developments, though not specifically requiring irrigation <br />systems by code, do require sod and plantings (unless given City Council approval for alternative restoration), <br />which in turn generally requires irrigation to survive. As we complete reconstruction and overlay projects on <br />newer subdivisions, it is apparent that irrigation systems are more common. In new subdivisions, the vast <br />majority of properties install an irrigation system. During ADA pedestrian ramp improvements, almost all <br />pedestrian ramps have irrigation heads adjacent to the work, and will have significant impacts. <br />It should be noted that under the current system, there is not a financial incentive for the contractors to reduce <br />damage. Where there's been obvious negligence by the contractor, staff does its best to help property owners <br />come to an agreement with the contractor for reimbursement or repairs, but negligence is often difficult to prove. <br />Based on the type of construction, there are times where the irrigation lines are simply in the way and impeding <br />construction. This is associated with the standard procedure for irrigation installation is to run main lines at or <br />near the back of curb or edge of pavement and placing irrigation heads at the edge of the pavement(s). <br />In staffs opinion, including irrigation repairs will provide the following benefits to city improvement projects: <br />