Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/04/2007

Home

9. 10. 11. 12. 18 That the Tower base and equipment will be completely enclosed With chain link fenci[11g, which, for security purposes, will also include barbed-wire around the top of the fepce that is 8 feet above ground level. That the Applicant has stated that there will be no personnel stationed at the site and 'the base of the Tower will be encompassed by a security fence to prevep.t unauthorizedentl:y. That the Applicant has stated that access to the Subject Property will be from the exis~ing Fire Station parking lot and that no parking will be required bec~use site visits Wil~ be infrequent and of limited duration. That City Code states that no new tower shall be approved unlessithe Ci:tYCounc~lfipp.s that the equipment planned for the proposed tower cannot be ,accommodated: on' an existing or approved tower or building within a I-mile radius of the proposed tower, for various reasons including insufficient height to reasonably function. 13. That the Applicant has stated that there are no existing buildings! or structures. in thy 1- mile search area of a sufficient height to accommodate the prq>poserl: equipment land provide a strong, seamless signal. . 14. That City Code requires newly constructed towers to accommpdate at leasttwo adq.iti(j)l1al users; the Applicant has stated that the Tower design would permit up to three additional users. 15. That City Code requires a monopole design unless the CityCoUllcil determines !tha~ an alternative design is preferred in cases where structural. or :design consideratipns, neighborhood compatibility, locational availability, or the number of potenual i 00- locations warrants this consideration. 16. That the proposed use will/will not substantially impair the use 'or market value of surrounding properties. That the proposed use will/will not be unduly dangerous or o~erwisedetriment~l i to persons working in the vicinity of the use, or to the pllblic welfare.! . . " That the proposed use will/will not be hazardous or distUrbing to . existing oriiftWe neighboring uses. 17. 18. 19. That the proposed use will/will not be served adequately by essentialpubl~c facilities and services. 20. . . ' , That the proposed use will/will not create excessive a.dditional requir,ements at pu~lici cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental totl1e ,economic w~lfate of the community. 21. That the proposed use will/will not involve equipment and conqlitipns of operatio~that will be detrimental to' any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. RESOLUTION #07-_-_ Page 2 of3