Resolution - #06-10-322 - 10/10/2006

Home

8) That the proposed interim use will result in adverse effects on the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. 9) That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. 10) That the proposed use will be dangerous or detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. 11) That the proposed use will not substantially or adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value of surrounding properties. 12) That the proposed use will not be operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and such use will not change the essential character of the area. 13) That the proposed use will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. 14) That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare ofthe community. 15) That the proposed use will be disturbing or hazardous to existing or future neighboring uses. 16) That the proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials and equipment and conditions of operation that may be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare, by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke or glare. 17) That the proposed use will not be in accordance with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the intent of Section 9.03.06(1) Interim Use Permits of the City Code. The proposed use would not be in accordance with the Interim Use Permit ordinance as it is stated. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Olson, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Gamec Councilmember Strommen Councilmember Olson Councilmember Cook Councilmember Elvig Councilmember Jeffrey Councilmember Pearson and the following voted against the same: None and the following abstained: None Resolution #06-10-322 Page 2 of3