Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10. That the proposed public amenities, facilities and open spaces are greater than the <br />minimum requirements of existing zoning and determined to be in the public good. <br /> <br />11. That the Applicant is proposing a development that is compatible with the purposes and <br />intents of this Zoning Chapter and the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />12. That the proposed development will not exercise any substantial detrimental influence on <br />the market value of surrounding properties. <br /> <br />13. That the proposed development will show a favorable economic impact on the community <br />at large. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed development will not adversely impact natural features such as wetlands, <br />water features, woodlands, and steep slopes. <br /> <br />15. That the proposed development will protect and preserve scenic qualities to the greatest <br />extent possible. <br /> <br />16. That the proposed development will not impose any undue burden on public services and <br />facilities, including fire and police protection, schools, streets, water systems, sanitary <br />sewer systems and storm sewer systems. <br /> <br />17. That the proposed development is not designed in such a way as to form a desirable and <br />unified environment within its own boundaries, and also will not be detrimental to future <br />land uses in the surrounding areas. <br /> <br />18. That the proposed development is consistent with all other applicable City and State <br />regulations. <br /> <br />19. That the following deviations from City Ordinances are found acceptable as part of this <br />PUD: reduced lot size requirements, resulting in 15 lots on 8,000 square feet each. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Olson, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec <br />Councilmember Cook <br />Councilmember Olson <br />Councilmember Elvig <br />Councilmember Pearson <br />Councilmember Strommen <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #06-10-335 <br />Page 2 of3 <br />