Laserfiche WebLink
immediately comply with provisions 1 of the netiee outlined in Minn. Stat. § 347, until the hearing <br />examiner issues an opinion. To appeal the dangerous or potentially dangerous dog declaration: <br />a. A request, identifying with specificity the basis for the dog owner's objection to the declaration shall <br />be filed in writing with the office of the chief of police within the allotted time per Minn. Stat. § 347 <br />14 days of eF+1,... ate of the seWiee of the Ret;ee. Failure to do so within the allotted time days <br />will terminate the owner's right to a hearing. <br />b. A �'� filing fee as established bay an annual fee scheclu shall be submitted with the appeal <br />request. In the event that the dangerous dog declaration is not upheld by the hearing examiner, the <br />filing fee will be refunded to the dog's owner. Per Minn. Stat. § 347 , if the dangerous dog <br />declaration is upheld by the hearing examiner, actual expenses of the hearing up to a maximum <br />allowed by Minnesota Statute of $1,000.08 will be the responsibility of the dog's owner. <br />c. A hearing shall be conducted within the allotted time per Minn. Stat. § 347 t--R days unless a later <br />date iS miA-Nally -...reed to by the h.,a Fin...,..amineF the .J.,.. owner and the city. <br />d. The hearing officer shall issue a decision on the matter within the allotted time per Minn. Stat. § 347 <br />tie-Rafter the hearing. The decision must be delivered to the dog's owner by hand delivery or <br />registered mail as soon as practical and a copy must be provided to the animal control authority. <br />e. If the hearing officer affirms the dangerous dog declaration, the owner will have 14 days from receipt <br />of that decision to comply with all requirements of the notice. <br />f. Any costs incurred for the care, keeping, and disposition of the dog are the responsibility of the <br />person claiming an interest in the dog, except to the extent that a court or hearing officer finds that <br />the seizure or impoundment was not substantially justified by law. <br />(5) Failure to restrain an attack by a dog. <br />a. It shall be unlawful for an owner to fail to restrain a dog from inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily <br />injury to any person or other animal. Violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor. The court, <br />upon a finding of the defendant's guilt hereunder, is authorized to order, as part of the disposition of <br />the case, that the animal be destroyed based on a written order containing one or more of the <br />following findings of fact: <br />i. The animal is dangerous as demonstrated by a vicious attack, an unprovoked attack, an <br />attack without warning, or multiple attacks; or <br />ii. The owner of the animal has demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to control the <br />animal in order to prevent injury to persons or other animals. <br />b. If the court does not order the destruction of the dog, the court, as an alternative, may order the <br />defendant to provide, and show proof to the court of public liability insurance in the minimum <br />amount allowed by Minnesota Statute e#f39A�9A�9. <br />(6) Stopping an attack. <br />a. If any peliee effieer eF animal control officer is witness to an attack by a dog upon a person or another <br />animal, the officer may take whatever means they deem appropriate to bring the attack to an end <br />and prevent further injury to the victim. <br />(7) Grounds for seizure and impoundment. <br />a. The animal control authority shall immediately seize any dog if: <br />i. The animal control authority has reason to believe that the dog is a dangerous or potentially <br />dangerous dog and is kept or maintained under conditions or circumstances creating an <br />unacceptable risk of harm to physical persons or other domesticated animals. <br />(Supp. No. 14, Update 2) <br />Created: 2025-06-25 08:17:43 [EST] <br />Page 15 of 19 <br />