12/07/06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

limited in future utilization of the eastern portion of the property. The applicant indicated that his intent was to expand, and the Planning Commission approved the plan. Ms. Dalnes advised in accordance with City Code, Staff recommends denial of a subdivision that would create a lot with no frontage on a public road. There are the following alternatives to platting this lot that would allow the construction of an additional building: 1) Seek a Conditional Use Permit for multiple principal buildings on one lot; 2) Seek a rezoning to PUD, and allow multiple buildings on one lot within the PUD. Associate Planner Dalnes advised staff recommends that the applicant explore these possibilities rather than producing a deficient lot and creating the potential for conflict among various property owners in the future regarding access. Both of the above options allow Mr. Minks to develop a building and sell the building space through the common - interest - community (CIC) platting process, but he would retain ownership of the land. Associate Planner Dalnes requested the Board also consider the sketch plan for Minks Business Park 2nd Addition, which is Case No. 1 of the Planning Commission meeting following this Board of Adjustment meeting. Citizen Input Mr. Ben Minks, applicant, stated when they went through the process originally the building was set 30 to 40 feet to the east of where it sits today. At that meeting it was brought up that he should possibly bring the building farther to the west, leaving room for the flexibility to do something with that east chunk of ground, which is a little over 1 I /4 acres. Mr. Minks stated he had two options; he could build an addition onto his building so in the end it would be an L shaped building, or he thinks the best use would be a separate building. He is proposing this ingress - egress or some possibility with an easement for the use of the ingress- egress. He has a potential person that wants to buy that piece of ground and put up a 10,000 square foot building for carpet related business supplies. He has a carpet store leasing in his main building so it would warehouse materials for that carpet store to do business. Board Member Levine asked if Mr. Minks' intention is to sell the lot once it is divided. Mr. Minks responded in the affirmative. Board Member Hunt asked if Mr. Minks had indicated he would deed part of Lot 2 for the access. Mr. Minks replied this would be an idea. Currently there is zero frontage, and he would then get some frontage. 200 feet of frontage is needed, except for on cul -de -sacs, and this would be on a cul -de -sac. Acting Chairperson Van Scoy inquired about the minimum frontage on cul -de -sacs. Board of Adjustment/December 7, 2006 Page 9 of 16