|
regulations regarding typical bulk standards, such as lot size, lot width, etc., within the MRCCA district.
<br />Additionally, since the Subject Property is less than ten (10) acres in size, the subdivision design standards in the
<br />MRCCA district, such as designating a certain percentage of Primary Conservation Areas as protected open space,
<br />do not apply.
<br />Within the MRCCA, there are "Primary Conservation Areas" or PCAs, which include areas such as Shore Impact
<br />Zones (SIZ, which is equal to 50% of the required structure setback from the OHW), areas within fifty (50) feet of
<br />a wetland or natural drainage way, BIZ, areas of native plant communities, and significant existing vegetative
<br />stands. There are two (2) Significant Existing Vegetative Stands on the Subject Property, both consisting
<br />primarily of eastern red cedar, although there are other species mixed in as well. While these are PCAs, City
<br />Code does not outright prohibit tree removal from these areas. In fact, City Code states that with a Vegetation
<br />Permit, intensive tree clearing activity is permitted as long as it is the minimum necessary for development. In
<br />addition to a Vegetation Permit to clear a portion of a PCA, a Vegetation Restoration Plan will also be required.
<br />Staff has an inquiry into the DNR about whether these should be submitted and reviewed as part of the
<br />subdivision process or as part of the individual building permit applications for the new homes.
<br />Staff sent the Sketch Plan to the MN DNR Area Hydrologist for review and comments. The primary comment
<br />from the DNR focused on how the Applicant determined the OHW, as the Area Hydrologist noted that it was
<br />much lower than what their modeling information indicates it should be. The Sketch Plan notes that the "edge of
<br />water" elevation of 834.1 feet. However, the OHW is not synonymous with the edge of water. In fact, per MN
<br />State Statute 103G.005, the OHW is defined as the point where vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to
<br />predominately terrestrial. Per the DNR, the OHW should be approximately 837.9 feet. Since the structure
<br />setback is based on the OHW, this will likely impact house placement, meaning homes will need to be shifted
<br />north, closer to Riverdale Drive.
<br />Both a Vegetation Permit, which will address the clearing necessary for the proposed development, and a
<br />Vegetation Restoration Plan, which would aim to reestablish suitable and native vegetation where possible on
<br />site, are needed. This information must be included with the Applicant's next submittal.
<br />Setbacks
<br />As proposed, the house pads appear to be set just beyond the minimum 100-foot setback from the OHW (per the
<br />MRCCA standards). However, under the new Zoning Code, in the R-1A district, homes must comply with a
<br />minimum front yard setback of twenty-five (25) feet and cannot be more than thirty-five (35) feet behind the front
<br />property. There is a caveat to this, though. When there is an existing setback pattern established on either side of
<br />a new development, the new homes can conform to that established pattern. Thus, the proposed house pads will
<br />need to be shifted north slightly to adhere to the existing setback pattern of the homes to the east (all of which also
<br />are riparian lots). This is beneficial for multiple reasons. First, it will create additional space in the rear yard for
<br />typical homeowner improvements (such as swimming pools, sheds, etc.) that are not permitted within the
<br />100-foot structure setback. Secondly, at least for the easternmost lot, this should likely result in less tree removal,
<br />as there is no tree cover along the eastern edge and northeastern portion of the plat.
<br />Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) and the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS)
<br />The City's NRI does not identify any native plant communities on the Subject Property. Along the edge of the
<br />river, there is a narrow strip designated as a semi-natural or altered/non-native plant community. This area is
<br />within the 100-foot setback from the OHW, which means there should not be major impacts to this vegetation.
<br />There are three (3) different land cover classifications on the Subject Property, including 'Upland Forest' (this is
<br />the area essentially designated as an 'Altered/Non-Native Plant Community'), 'Woodland', and 'Urban with
<br />Vegetative Cover'. The vast majority of the Subject Property is classified as 'Woodland'.
<br />It does not appear that there are any wetlands present on the Subject Property. However, along the river's edge,
<br />there is floodplain identified, including Floodway (mostly the main channel of the river) and Flood Fridge.
<br />Again, these designations appear to be contained within the 100-foot structure setback from the OHW, which
<br />means there should not be any conflicts with structures being constructed within the areas designated as
<br />floodplain.
|