Minutes - Council - 01/09/2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

will have a lesser impact on the existing neighborhood than other possible commercial uses. 2. The Community's expenditures for new or additional services required by the proposed land use will be recovered if the proposal goes forward. Staff is of the opinion, that the proposed land use change will not increase the City's expenditures compared to the current land use designation. The subject property is currently within the MUSA. 3. Environmentally sensitive resources should be known, and as per section 9.21.01 of the city code "development shall be so regulated as to minimize the risk of environmental damage to these areas." There is significant tree cover on the site, a portion of which will be permanently preserved. There are no other known environmentally sensitive resources on the site. 4. The potential of the parcel containing a greenway corridor or open space area should be reviewed and if present, appropriate preservation strategies shall be employed. Not applicable. 5. Sewer and water capacity is adequate to service the proposed development. Sewer and water have been extended down Ebony Street to service this property, as well as adjacent properties. 6. The type of density transition, as required by Section 9.20.05 Subd. 3.c. of City Code, that will be utilized as part of the land use shall be identified and approved by the City Council. Density transition is discussed in the preliminary plat case. The submitted plans meet City Code requirements on the eastern property line, but no transitioning is required on the southern property line because that lot is currently vacant. 7. No urban development, other than cluster subdivisions as allowed by Section 9.20.11 of City Code, will be considered north of Trott Brook until the completion of the Comprehensive Plan Update. The proposed development is south of Trott Brook. Associate Planner Geisler reviewed that the City Council reviewed Ebony Woods at the September 26, 2006 meeting, and tabled the project to a work session for further discussion of zoning and land use surrounding the property. The Council discussed the proposal at the October 10, 2006 work session and directed the developer to prepare revised building elevations. The Council also reviewed the proposal at the November 14, 2006 regular meeting, and requested additional revisions. The revised elevations are discussed as part of the preliminary plat and site plan case. This case was before the City Council on December 28, 2006, but was tabled at the request of the applicant. City Council / January 9, 2007 Page 11 of 24