Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Murphy indicated he would be willing to work in a small planning session with the <br />Councilmembers to come up with something for the architecture. He would like some <br />agreement that the project would pass the Council's muster. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Elvig observed the Council appears to be in agreement that this product would be <br />an amenity to the neighborhood, but that the massing is an issue. Architecture, staggering and <br />color textures should be used to decrease the visual massing and a cookie cutter type appearance. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised there are time constraints on the application. He asked if the <br />applicant is willing to extend the timeline. <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated this is a PUD so there will be final plat <br />review. The 60 days officially expires February 9, 2007, and there is another Council meeting <br />prior to that where this could be reviewed. In the past the Council has talked about a lot of <br />changes, and from staffs perspective in the cycle of getting comments and talking to Mr. <br />Murphy there has been some changes, but they keep having the same conversation that the <br />changes are not quite enough. He requested the Council to be as clear as they can regarding the <br />changes they are requesting. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Elvig stated he does not see much change from the first time he saw this plan. <br />There is vinyl wall board, and there is now vinyl shingles. He does not see any staggering in <br />front, which he clearly articulated before. He does not see that the Council's recommendations <br />have been addressed. If the Council is going to review this again there should be significant <br />changes and an effort put forth for a visual decreasing of the mass. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Olson, seconded by Councilmember Look, to table the following <br />cases: <br />Case No.5: Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Case of DPM Investments, <br />Inc. <br />Case No.6: Request to Rezone Property from B-2 Business to Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD); Case ofDPM Investments, Inc. <br />Case No.7: Request for Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Plan Review of Ebony <br />Woods; Case ofDPM Investments, Inc. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Jeffrey asked if the changes will be presented at a Council <br />work session. Community Development Director Trudgeon replied a work session would <br />provide the Council with the ability for give and take without being forced with a decision. <br />Following the work session it could move to a Council meeting for approval. Councilmember <br />Jeffrey suggested Mr. Murphy bring an architect to the work session discussion. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Acting Mayor Elvig, Councilmembers Olson, Look, Dehen, <br />Jeffrey, and Strommen. Voting No: None. Abstain: Mayor Gamec. <br /> <br />City Council / January 9, 2007 <br />Page 17 of24 <br />